Skip to content
Open access

Do humans and large language models agree on the quality of synthesis plans?

2026 · Digital Discovery · 1 citation · 36 references

TL;DR

This work evaluated the agreement between LLMs and expert chemists on holistic evaluations of the retrosynthetic routes and found no agreement on holistic evaluations of the retrosynthetic routes.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have seen widespread adoption in all spheres of science including chemistry and cheminformatics. We evaluated the agreement between LLMs and expert chemists on holistic evaluations of the retrosynthetic routes.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Editorial Open access Sep 2026

Reproducibility in the era of large language models

The rise of large language models adds new layers of complexity, underscoring the need for clearer reporting standards and community-wide best practices.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Natural language search queries in zbMATH Open

In June 2026, zbMATH Open has released an experimental search option facilitating the translation of natural language queries into faceted search commands, taking full advantage of the traditional precise query language without requiring knowledge of its details.

O. Teschke · 0 citations

The Unreasonable Benchmark

F. Pérez-Cruz, B. Hitaj, G. Dimitri et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Exploring Transition Metal Complexes with Large Language Models

Here we use a large language model for the exploration of chemical space of transition metal complexes (TMCs), fine-tuning the open-source Llama-3.2-1B model with a variation of the SMILES string...

Yun-Sheng Liu, Jacob W. Toney, Joe Cavanagh et al. · 4 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.