Predictive artificial intelligence applications in pollutant hazard assessment, environmental monitoring, exposure modeling, multi-omics integration, and regulatory decision support are examined.
Abstract
Environmental toxicology must evaluate an expanding range of industrial chemicals, emerging contaminants, transformation products, and complex mixtures. Conventional experimental approaches alone cannot efficiently address the scale and heterogeneity of available chemical, biological, and environmental data. This narrative review examines predictive artificial intelligence applications in pollutant hazard assessment, environmental monitoring, exposure modeling, multi-omics integration, and regulatory decision support. Machine-learning and deep-learning models can integrate chemical descriptors, high-throughput screening data, omics profiles, and environmental sensor measurements to support chemical prioritization and mechanism-informed risk assessment. These approaches may also contribute to New Approach Methodologies and reduce reliance on selected animal-testing procedures. However, their reliability is limited by dataset bias, domain shift, insufficient external validation, restricted transferability across chemical classes and ecosystems, and endpoint-specific regulatory requirements. AI should therefore be considered a complementary component of environmental toxicology rather than a standalone replacement for experimental evidence. Future progress requires standardized and representative datasets, transparent model reporting, independent validation, uncertainty characterization, and clearly defined applicability domains.
AI should complement, not replace, experimental and expert evaluation, supporting a transition toward more predictive, mechanism-informed assessment of real-world chemical exposures, and proposes a framework for regulatory-grade implementation.
J. Domingo, Marília Cristina Oliveira Souza, Fernando Barbosa· Toxicology· 0 citations
This review critically evaluates the evidence base for AI-based toxicity prediction, assesses current challenges and considers the trajectory toward next-generation risk assessment, which requires adherence to the TREAT validation principles and sustained regulatory engagement.
Kamil Kuča, Siddhi Otari, Namrata Singh et al.· Archives of Toxicology· 0 citations
The regulatory-readiness framework is expanded to incorporate OECD QSAR validation principles, chemical data curation, descriptor generation, applicability-domain assessment, scaffold-aware and prospective validation, explainability beyond SHAP, calibrated uncertainty analysis and AOP-linked mechanistic interpretation.
The increasing burden of persistent organic pollutants, per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances, heavy metals, and emerging contaminants represents a global threat to human, animal, and ecosystem health. Current management strategies remain fragmented and reactive, limiting the effectiveness of the One Health paradigm. Thi...
Toxicokinetics (TK) characterizes the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of chemicals in the body and connects exposure with internal dose and potential toxicity. Because in vivo and in vitro TK assays are costly and low-throughput, and demand for emerging chemicals is growing, artificial intell...
Xue Wu, Zhi-Cheng Zhang, Kun Mi et al.· Journal of Environmental Exp...· 0 citations
This review discusses recent progress in ML, DL, and AI-based strategies for toxicity prediction, assesses their utility across major toxicity endpoints, and highlights the challenges and future research opportunities in predictive toxicology.
Anjali Mahavar, Atul Patel, Ashish Patel· Current Chemical Biology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.