Skip to content
#edge computing Open access

ENHANCING UNDERWATER LIVE FISH DETECTION PERFORMANCE WITH YOLOV11 AND IMAGE ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES IN A REAL-TIME SYSTEM

Sep 2026 · Jurnal Teknologi Perikanan dan Kelautan · 0 citations · 19 references
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies

Abstract

Underwater fish detection is challenged by low light, turbidity, and blue-green color dominance from light attenuation. This study aims to compare six image-enhancement scenarios (baseline, CLAHE, Retinex Ultra Lite, UDP, UDP Super Lite, and Gamma Correction + White Balance) combined with YOLOv11 to evaluate their detection accuracy and inference speed under challenging underwater conditions, and identify the most suitable method for real-time embedded underwater vision. Experiments used a controlled fish tank, filmed with an OAK-D camera under five natural lighting conditions (09:00–16:00 WIB). Performance was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively on a 600-frame test set (four illumination conditions), computing precision, recall, and mAP@0.5 from YOLOv11 predictions, plus inference speed in frames per second (FPS) on a Raspberry Pi 5 + OAK-D. CLAHE gave the best balance (precision 0.86, recall 0.83, mAP@0.5 0.84, 17 FPS); Gamma + White Balance was slightly less accurate (mAP@0.5 0.82) but faster (19.8 FPS); both outperformed the baseline (mAP@0.5 0.69, 21.3 FPS). Retinex Ultra Lite, UDP Super Lite, and full UDP all fell below 15 FPS (5.8–8.7 FPS), making them unsuitable for real-time edge deployment despite similar or lower accuracy. Lightweight, effective enhancement significantly improves real-time underwater fish detection on embedded devices, with CLAHE identified as the most suitable method for underwater object identification and quantification systems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.