Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Uneven geographies and hierarchies of investability in the Global Environment Facility

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Anonymous replication package This package reproduces the manuscript’s six main figures, two appendix figures, the appendix bootstrap table, model tables, allocation-rule checks, country-clustered inference, and concentration-index analysis. It contains no manuscript files, author names, institutional paths, Git history, personal notes, or exploratory model branches. Quick start Use R 4.6 or a recent R 4.x release. From this directory: ```sh Rscript install_dependencies.R Rscript --vanilla run_all.R Rscript --vanilla tests/verify_outputs.R ``` The analysis does not require network access when the included cached inputs are present. A complete run took approximately two minutes on the validation machine; package installation and compilation of geospatial dependencies may take longer. Generated files are written to: - `data/processed/` — derived analytical data - `output/tables/` — result tables and figure data - `output/figures/` — manuscript and appendix figures - `output/figures/archive/` — diagnostic and component figures - `output/logs/` — model logs, R session details, and verification report Validated reference outputs are in `reference/`. The verifier compares all 46 reference CSV tables numerically (tolerance `1e-8`) and confirms the existence and pixel dimensions of nine manuscript/appendix figures. Workflow `run_all.R` executes 19 scripts in dependency order: 1. merge the co-financing and programming-strategy inputs; 2. construct population and income-category lookups; 3. calculate financing per capita and allocation-rule sensitivities; 4. build the income-group, source/type, focal-area, objective, alluvial, and bivariate-map figures; 5. estimate portfolio, link-function, multinomial, governance, interaction, Tobit, and country-clustered models; and 6. calculate population-weighted concentration indices with a 2,000-draw country bootstrap; and 7. build Figure 3’s three-source panel and its appendix table, with a 2,000-draw country bootstrap stratified by income group. The original script numbers are retained to preserve traceability to the working analysis. Gaps correspond to exploratory or superseded scripts that were deliberately excluded; see `RELEASE_NOTES.md`. Important definitions - “Private” means rows whose co-financing source is `Private Sector`. - Variables beginning `Public_` are an internal legacy label for all **non-private** sources, not only government sources. - Project co-financing uses CEO-stage values when any positive CEO-stage co-financing is present for the project, otherwise PIF-stage values. - Programme-objective columns use the programming-strategies export’s CEO-stage GEF project-financing allocation where positive, otherwise its PIF-stage GEF project-financing allocation. - Objective-code matching covers GEF-5 parent codes, GEF-6 `_P` sub-codes, and GEF-7 hyphenated sub-codes. Non-numbered enabling-activity codes and GEF-7 `IP SFM ...` programme labels are excluded. - GEF project financing is a project-level value repeated across source/type rows and is retained once per project; it is not summed across those rows. - Multi-country project amounts are allocated to recipient countries by population in the primary analysis. Equal, GDP, and land-area allocations are reported as robustness checks. - Income-group summaries use geometric means after country aggregation. Figure 3 `30_figure3_three_source_panel.R` produces the manuscript’s Figure 3 (`output/figures/figure03_source3_type_3x2_panel.png`), which splits co-financing by three sources (private sector, recipient country government, other sources) and two types (for-profit, not-for-profit), with 95 per cent country-bootstrap error bars. It also writes the appendix table reporting those intervals, the number of zero-co-financing countries, the largest recipient in each cell, and the bootstrap probability of each income ordering (`output/tables/appendix_fig3_bootstrap_table.docx`, with the underlying values in the two `appendix_fig3_bootstrap_panel_*.csv` files). `10_figures_3_4_multicountry.R` still writes the earlier two-by-two version (`figure03_forprofit_notforprofit_2x2_panel.png`), which the manuscript no longer uses. It is retained because script 30 reconciles its own three-way source split against all sixteen values of that figure, so any divergence between the two constructions fails the run rather than passing silently. Reproducibility status The release was successfully run from a fresh local copy on 24 September 2026 with R 4.6.1 on arm64 macOS. All retained scripts completed, the three bootstrap procedures had zero failed replicates, the objective-code test recovered all 32 intended GEF-7 sub-code columns, both of script 30’s reconciliation checks passed, and the output verifier passed. The captured software environment is in `reference/sessionInfo.txt`. One expected warning can occur in the sparse multinomial model: `sqrt(diag(vc)): NaNs produced`. It concerns unavailable conventional standard errors for sparse category/term combinations; it does not terminate the model, and the manuscript-facing country-cluster bootstrap completes with zero failed replicates. Data provenance and limitation See `DATA_SOURCES.md`. The central co-financing input is an analysis-ready snapshot containing manual corrections. A comparison with the dated public export found 96 differing project/source/type cells. Because a complete machine-readable correction log was unavailable, replacing the snapshot with the public export would alter the reported results. The snapshot is therefore retained transparently, rather than presenting the workflow as raw-to-results.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

GPT-Lab Sep 23, 2026

Requirements Don’t Live in Isolation: What We’re Exploring with Req-Space

Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…

GPT-Lab Sep 17, 2026

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering

AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.