TransCAVE-E: A distributed virtual reality testbed for adaptive external human-machine interfaces
Yun YeZexuan LiHaoyang LiangBoya SunJian SunHaotian Shi
Sep 2026
Human-computer Interaction
Abstract
External human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) are evolving from predefined displays toward adaptive communication strategies that respond to changing traffic and road-user states. This transition requires experimental infrastructure that supports human-in-the-loop (HIL) interaction, software-in-the-loop (SIL) algorithm execution, reusable experiment orchestration, and synchronized multimodal human-factors evaluation. This paper presents TransCAVE-E, a distributed virtual-reality testbed for developing and validating adaptive and intelligent eHMIs. The platform integrates three coupled modules: a Scenario Design Center for configurable traffic environments and experimental conditions; an eHMI Algorithm Module for bidirectional real-time coupling between simulation and external algorithms; and a Data Management System that synchronizes trajectories, eye-tracking, physiological, system-log, and subjective data. A distributed multi-agent architecture supports synchronous interaction among pedestrians, human drivers, automated vehicles, and other traffic entities. Two use cases demonstrate the platform. In an AV-pedestrian experiment, an intent-recognition-based eHMI improved decision efficiency by 12.8% and 13.0% in yielding and non-yielding scenarios, reduced gaze distraction by 17.1% in the yielding scenario, and reduced unnecessary prompts by 40% in the non-yielding scenario while maintaining interaction safety. An HV-AV study further demonstrated real-time SIL validation of a game-theoretic information-disclosure strategy under active driver interaction. TransCAVE-E provides an extensible and reproducible infrastructure for closed-loop evaluation and iterative refinement of intelligent human-vehicle communication strategies.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.