SPMC, a training framework that identifies grounding-responsive heads and selectively regularizes their text-to-image attention, demonstrates that targeted guidance of sparse and implicit visual evidence pathways can directly improve multimodal reasoning.
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning tasks, yet remain prone to hallucinations and over-reliance on language priors, often generating answers without adequately using task-relevant visual evidence. Existing approaches primarily improve reasoning through reasoning-oriented supervision or inference-time strategies. In this work, we study a complementary question: can multimodal reasoning be improved by strengthening implicit visual grounding without directly supervising the reasoning process? Motivated by the functional specialization of attention heads, we investigate whether reasoning can be improved by guiding only the heads most responsive to visual evidence grounding. We propose Selective Probability Mass Concentration (sPMC), a training framework that identifies grounding-responsive heads and selectively regularizes their text-to-image attention. sPMC treats normalized attention over visual tokens as a spatial probability distribution and encourages the probability mass to be assigned to semantically relevant regions using segmentation-derived spatial priors. Adaptive Head Selection restricts this guidance to visually responsive heads while leaving the remaining heads unconstrained to preserve their complementary functions. Across 6 multimodal benchmark suites, sPMC achieves an average zero-shot improvement of 3% and gains of up to 11.3% across multiple MLLMs while regularizing only 3%-15% of their attention heads. These results demonstrate that targeted guidance of sparse and implicit visual evidence pathways can directly improve multimodal reasoning.
Vision-Language Models are commonly evaluated through their final predictions, but understanding whether these decisions are grounded in visual evidence requires tracing how visual information contributes to language-based decisions. With this purpose in mind, we investigate cross-modal information flow in a video-base...
Davide Testa, Hugh Mee Wong, Alessandro Lenci et al.· 0 citations
Reasoning segmentation aims to interpret implicit textual queries and enable fine-grained visual perception, which is critical for applications such as human-computer interaction and embodied agents. Existing methods typically generate explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) by multimodal large language models (MLLMs) before l...
Tian-Hang Guo, Yu-Lin He, Wei Chen et al.· 0 citations
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have made remarkable progress across visual perception tasks, yet spatial reasoning remains a persistent weakness, especially for questions that require reasoning over visual space. Recent spatial-reasoning methods incorporate generated grounding, where models predict bounding boxes...
Rafi Ibn Sultan, Xiang-Yu Zhou, Mohammad O. S. Chowdhury et al.· 0 citations
The results position image editing as a specialized visual workspace rather than a universal reasoning mechanism, and establish Aphanta as a reusable protocol for measuring task--representation alignment, editor realization, and downstream pipeline utility.
Heng-Yuan Xu, Wei Cheng, Yu-Meng Ji et al.· 0 citations
Whether attention weights faithfully reflect model reasoning has been actively debated in NLP, yet this question remains largely unexplored for the visual modality in Vision-Language Models (VLMs). We address this gap through causal perturbation analysis on current VLMs, evaluating both the comprehensiveness and suffic...
Xu-Rui Song, Wei-Shi Wang, Zhong-Qi Yue et al.· 2 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.