Skip to content

FB-GDM: Fully-Bayesian Guided Diffusion Models for High-Dimensional Linear Inverse Problems via Unsupervised Variational Inference

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 46 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

FB-GDM is robust when the forward operator, the noise level, or the image distribution changes, and stays close to a per-problem $\Pi$GDM oracle throughout and does not exhibit the hallucinations observed with DPS, whereas DPS substantially degrades at a fixed scale and $\Pi$GDM stays competitive only if it is re-tuned against the ground truth for each new problem.

Abstract

Diffusion models are powerful priors for linear inverse problems, but the reference guidance methods, Diffusion Posterior Sampling (DPS) and Pseudoinverse-Guided Diffusion Models ($\Pi$GDM), rely on scalar hyperparameters tuned per task, usually against the ground truth. We introduce FB-GDM, a fully-Bayesian guided diffusion method that removes this calibration step. Starting from the Gaussian approximation of $\Pi$GDM, we derive a closed-form conditional score that depends on two precision parameters (inverse variances), one associated with the denoising approximation and one with the observation likelihood, and treat them as latent variables inferred by variational inference at each reverse step. A separable factorization makes each update scale linearly with the number of pixels, so the inference stays tractable at full image resolution, at a cost comparable to one $\Pi$GDM run. FB-GDM requires neither the noise level nor the ground truth: its only inputs are the observation and the forward operator. Experiments on CelebA-HQ inverse problems establish two results. (i) The precision parameters, inferred from the observation alone, allow FB-GDM to outperform $\Pi$GDM at its nominal setting, even when the latter is given the true noise level, by up to 14 dB depending on the operator, and to match the ground-truth-calibrated $\Pi$GDM oracle within 0.1 dB. (ii) FB-GDM is robust when the forward operator, the noise level, or the image distribution changes: it stays close to a per-problem $\Pi$GDM oracle throughout and does not exhibit the hallucinations observed with DPS, whereas DPS substantially degrades at a fixed scale and $\Pi$GDM stays competitive only if it is re-tuned against the ground truth for each new problem. When the prior is applied to images outside its training set, this re-balancing between data and prior keeps FB-GDM faithful where a fixed face-prior guidance can otherwise hallucinate.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Kinetic Langevin Meets Split Gibbs: Accelerated Posterior Sampling for Imaging Inverse Problems with Diffusion Priors

Split Gibbs sampling (SGS) is a popular framework for posterior sampling in Bayesian imaging inverse problems. It decouples a Gaussian data-fidelity term from a complex prior through an auxiliary variable, so the data variable is updated exactly and only the prior-side conditional is hard to sample. Existing samplers t...

Dai Hai Nguyen, Duc Dung Nguyen · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Posterior-Dynamics Framework for Imaging Inverse Problems with Pretrained Diffusion Priors

This work defines an explicit surrogate posterior path and derives the Posterior-Dynamics Implicit--Explicit sampler (PD-IMEX), a stable method using one score evaluation per diffusion scale and an implicit data-consistency update, and derives continuous posterior dynamics.

Zhao-Qiang Liu, T. Pang, Ruibing Wang et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

PEEL-DDPM: Physics-Enabled Evidential Learning for the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model

Normal-inverse-gamma (NIG) regression is not identifiable from its marginal Student-t likelihood: three combinations of four NIG parameters are determined, leaving one degree of freedom. We introduce PEEL-DDPM, a physics-enabled evidential learning framework for denoising diffusion probabilistic models. A measurement-c...

Wang Ge · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

CLIMB-flow: Coupled Linear Inverse posterior sampling via Multiscale-Based flow

Diffusion models are now widely used in Bayesian inverse problems in imaging as priors, where latent diffusion models are often used for larger scale problems to keep the computational complexity and model-size manageable. Unfortunately, the auto-encoder based compression results in loss of spatial detail. In addition,...

Ze-Qiu Yu, Rui Yuan, Mathews Jacob · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

SNaP: One-Step Posterior Sampling for Noisy Inverse Problems

SNaP is introduced, a one-step MeanFlow posterior sampler for linear inverse problems with Gaussian noise, which produces diverse, high-quality samples with one network evaluation per draw, 30 to 2250 $\times$ faster than iterative samplers.

Shirin Shoushtari, Edward P. Chandler, Xiao Shi et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Active Diffusion-Based Inference for Ill-Posed Inverse Problems Under Incomplete Priors

Many scientific and engineering applications require estimating unknown parameters from experimentally observable data -- an inverse problem that is inherently challenging due to nonlinearity, noise, and ill-posedness. In this paper, we propose an active diffusion-based inverse problem solver. A diffusion model is trai...

Jitao Xu, N. Sato, Yaohang Li · 1 citation

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.