Skip to content

Learning Spectral Allocation: A Fractional Diffusion Framework for Adaptive Volumetric Segmentation

Yi-Hui Shen Tie-Qiang Li
Sep 2026
Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision

Abstract

We address adaptive computation in 3D medical image segmentation: instead of designing another backbone, we ask how much spectral mixing each network stage needs and let optimization answer. We derive FHEAT, a two-parameter operator family, from the discrete cosine transform (DCT) solution of a fractional heat equation. A fractional order alpha and a diffusion strength D govern the operator, and at D=0 it is exactly the identity. Reparametrized by the semigroup time tau = D*alpha, same-resolution instances compose exactly, so any distribution of diffusion across same-resolution stages amounts to a single Sobolev-type regularizer of learned strength. This identity limit lets the optimizer of each layer, not the designer, decide whether global mixing is needed and how sharp it should be. We instantiate FHEAT in a lightweight U-shaped architecture (Light-UNETR) paired with a Kolmogorov-Arnold mixer (KAN3D) with adaptive rational activations, yielding FHEAT-Seg. At 5% to 20% label rates on three public benchmarks, training produces gradient-driven spectral sparsification: seven of the eight stage-level operators drive D to zero, and the survivor saturates at the sharpest low-pass (alpha ~ 0.9) in the decoder layer feeding the semi-supervised attention map. The retired layers become exact identity shortcuts at inference, cutting FLOPs from 4.29G to 0.90G (a 79% drop) at 0.975M parameters. Under a standard semi-supervised protocol, FHEAT-Seg reaches Dice scores of 90.47% (left atrium), 78.79% (Pancreas-CT), and 81.90% (BraTS 2019), ahead of five semi-supervised methods and the Light-UNETR baseline. The large variant also surpasses Light-UNETR-L under full supervision (Dice 93.09%, 85.11%, and 87.19%) with 2.851M parameters and 55.75G FLOPs. These results suggest that the allocation of spectral computation is a learnable property of optimization dynamics, not a manual design commitment.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.