Aug 2026· Discover Oncology· Vol 17· 0 citations· 89 references
TL;DR
Current evidence indicates that ctDNA is the most mature platform for molecular profiling, prognostic assessment, treatment monitoring, and MRD research, although sensitivity remains limited in localized disease.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a major clinical challenge because reliable biomarkers for early detection, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring are still limited. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising complementary approach that enables minimally invasive assessment of tumor-derived material in body fluids. This review focuses on three selected and widely investigated liquid-biopsy biomarker classes in PDAC—ctDNA, CTCs, and exosome-derived biomarkers—because they map onto complementary molecular, cellular, and extracellular-vesicle compartments and have been evaluated across clinically relevant settings including diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring, and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. We summarize their biological basis, detection strategies, and clinical applications in early detection, prognostic assessment, treatment monitoring, and minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation. We also discuss assay selection in KRAS-wild-type disease, factors influencing ctDNA shedding, postoperative sampling timing, and the contribution of anatomically enriched body fluids such as bile and pancreatic juice. Current evidence indicates that ctDNA is the most mature platform for molecular profiling, prognostic assessment, treatment monitoring, and MRD research, although sensitivity remains limited in localized disease. CTCs provide intact cellular information and may offer prognostic value, but their rarity in peripheral blood and methodological heterogeneity limit routine use. Exosome-derived biomarkers are abundant and relatively stable, making them attractive for multiparametric diagnostic and prognostic models, although tumor specificity, isolation methods, and assay standardization remain substantial challenges. Overall, no single liquid-biopsy platform is sufficient for all PDAC scenarios. Future progress will require standardized methods, prospective clinical validation, and integrated biomarker strategies combined with established clinical parameters.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often diagnosed after the opportunity for curative treatment has passed. Blood-based biomarkers offer opportunities for earlier detection and serial molecular assessment, but their value depends on the intended clinical use. This nonsystematic narrative review critically exami...
Konstantinos Kossenas, N. Garmpis, Nikolaos Karountzos et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet predicting durable benefit and detecting resistance remain major challenges. As immunotherapy expands across disease stages, minimally invasive tools are increasingly needed to monitor response and inform treat...
T. D. Bazan Russo, V. Gristina, F. Pepe et al.· Cancers· 0 citations
: Liquid biopsy has emerged as a revolutionary, minimally invasive approach in precision oncology, enabling dynamic molecular profiling of tumors through analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes, and other biomarkers in body fluids. Focusing specifically on recent advances fro...
Ya-Qiong Guo, Xue-Ling Wei, Lin Zhu et al.· OncoTargets and Therapy· 0 citations
Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a highly lethal malignancy, characterized by late diagnosis, early systemic dissemination, and high recurrence rates. Conventional diagnostic and surveillance strategies have limited sensitivity for early disease detection and minimal residual disease. Liquid biopsy technologies have emer...
A. Aiolfi, D. Bona, E. Rausa et al.· Updates in Surgery· 0 citations
It is argued that clinically useful signatures should be question-specific, stage-aware, and specimen-aware rather than universal multi-analyte panels and the need for prospective validation across clinically diverse populations is argued.
Ke Xu, Yu Liu, Yuan Peng et al.· Biofactors· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.