Oct 2026· IEEE Internet of Things Journal· Vol 13, pp. 44080-44099· 0 citations· 150 references
Abstract
Edge intelligence is revolutionizing the Internet of Things (IoT) by migrating AI training from centralized clouds to distributed end devices. However, enabling continual learning (CL) on edge nodes faces a “rigid triangle constraint” of restricted memory, limited computation, and battery-dependent energy, heavily dictated by physical size, weight, and power (SWaP) limitations. This article systematically reviews solutions for resource-constrained CL in IoT scenarios, bridging algorithmic plasticity with these physical hardware realities. To mitigate the memory wall, we synthesize static model evolution techniques. We specifically highlight the cross-paradigm integration of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) with low-bit quantization and structural sparsity. Furthermore, this is presented alongside knowledge distillation (KD) as a zero-buffer regularizer to effectively accommodate storage-limited microcontrollers. Crucially, we emphasize energy-efficient inference as an integral part of the CL lifecycle, as continuous perception significantly depletes the same battery budget required for future backpropagation. To sustain long-term evolution, we discuss dynamic architectures, including mixture of experts (MoE) and cloud–edge offloading, to achieve on-demand compute allocation for energy efficiency (EE). Beyond isolated nodes, addressing the bandwidth and privacy bottlenecks of IoT, we analyze an end-to-end green data lifecycle—ranging from online value filtering and physical storage compression to federated CL (FCL) in untrusted environments. Ultimately, we argue that isolated algorithmic improvements are often insufficient. Therefore, grounded by empirical hardware benchmarks, this article emphasizes compute-optimal energy frontiers and memory hierarchy integration hardware-aware neural architecture search (HA-NAS). We propose that a full-stack system–hardware codesign incorporating non-von Neumann paradigms is an essential path for realizing autonomous, sustainable evolution across diverse next-generation IoT sectors.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.