Oct 2026· IEEE Internet of Things Journal· Vol 13, pp. 45537-45561· 0 citations· 57 references
Abstract
Due to limited computing resources and severe blockage in dense urban environments, uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled mobile edge computing (MEC) faces significant challenges in serving the Internet of Things (IoT) devices. In this article, by deploying multiple simultaneously transmitting and reflecting reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (STAR-RISs), we design a multi-UAV-enabled MEC network for computation offloading enhancement. A sum computation rate maximization problem is formulated under UAV mobility, energy, and reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) constraints. By decomposing the mixed-integer nonconvex problem into tractable subproblems, we develop an iterative algorithm that alternately optimizes resource allocation, network association, STAR-RIS phase shifts, and 3-D UAV trajectories. Specifically, closed-form solutions are first derived for power and frequency allocation via dual decomposition under the TDMA framework with maximum ratio combining (MRC) reception. Then, a greedy algorithm with local search is proposed for device–UAV–RIS association, followed by successive convex approximation (SCA) for trajectory optimization. Convergence analyses show that the surrogate objective sequence generated by the proposed block coordinate descent (BCD) algorithm is monotonically nondecreasing for the baseline formulation, and is empirically preserved under the proposed extensions. Robustness is further assessed under low UAV-to-RIS Rician-factor fading, external co-channel interference with an interference-aware trajectory, and rotary-wing propulsion-energy feasibility. Generality is validated on a representative mixed UAV fleet configuration, and performance is benchmarked against demonstration-initialized deep reinforcement learning baselines (TD3 and SAC). Extensive numerical results validate significant performance improvements over baseline schemes, confirming the effectiveness of joint STAR-RIS assistance and 3-D trajectory design.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.