This work introduces online LLM-based AAD, a novel optimization paradigm that treats the algorithm itself as a state-dependent decision variable and proposes OnDesign, a multi-agent framework that reconciles competing design perspectives to synthesize executable algorithms and uses execution feedback to refine how runtime evidence is interpreted for subsequent designs.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) enable automated algorithm design (AAD) through reasoning and code synthesis. However, most existing LLM-based AAD methods separate algorithm design from target optimization, deploying a fixed design even as the optimization state evolves. Conventional adaptive optimizers can respond to such changes, but their adjustments remain confined to predefined parameters, operators, or strategies. To address these limitations, we introduce online LLM-based AAD, a novel optimization paradigm that treats the algorithm itself as a state-dependent decision variable. At each stage, LLM agents synthesize an algorithm with new behavior logic from the current optimization state. Executing the generated algorithm advances the search and provides feedback for subsequent designs, coupling algorithm design with target optimization without requiring a separate offline algorithm pretraining stage. To implement this paradigm, we propose OnDesign, a multi-agent framework that reconciles competing design perspectives to synthesize executable algorithms and uses execution feedback to refine how runtime evidence is interpreted for subsequent designs. We evaluate OnDesign across two mainstream black-box optimization paradigms on three scenarios: Bayesian optimization, evolutionary continuous optimization, and evolutionary mixed-variable optimization. Extensive experiments on six benchmark suites and one engineering problem across multiple problem dimensions demonstrate superior overall performance over conventional optimizers and offline LLM-based AAD methods.
SynAct is presented, an adaptive closed-loop LLM reasoning--acting agent that iteratively diagnoses live synthesis reports and reasons over the current circuit state, retrieved tool knowledge, and historical optimization experience to issue targeted commands to improve timing.
Fang-Zhou Liu, Peiyi Han, Jia-Wei Liu et al.· 0 citations
Optimization modeling formulates real-world decision problems as mathematical programs that solvers can use to find optimal decisions. Large language models (LLMs) can automate this process, but the resulting correct formulations can require substantial time and memory to construct and solve, limiting practical scalabi...
Zhong Li, Xin Huang, Jin-Hui Wan et al.· 0 citations
This work investigates whether LLM-based agents can autonomously achieve substantial performance improvements in scientific software, including mature implementations that have already been extensively optimized by human developers.
Pavlin G. Poličar, Martin Špendl, Tomaž Hočevar· 0 citations
An automated approach that uses Large Language Models in an agentic check--fix--verify loop to synthesize executable Python scripts that act as interpretable, problem-specific feature extractors that consistently outperform both expert-curated mzn2feat features and the best transformer-based trans2feat variants.
Hai Xia, C. Ansótegui, Stefan Szeider· 0 citations
AlgoEvo is introduced, a unified agentic architecture that transforms automated algorithm discovery into an interactive, knowledge-accumulating process, demonstrating strong intra-task accumulation, cross-task transfer, and the ability to reproduce or exceed the strongest existing methods through flexible skill activat...
Jun-Hao Qiu, Qing-Long Hu, Ji Cheng et al.· 1 citation
Large language model (LLM)-based automatic heuristic design (AHD) iteratively proposes and refines heuristics, pairing design rationales with executable code. Task-specific evaluators assess programs; execution outcomes and performance scores guide search. Many AHD systems keep the generator frozen; EvoTune and Co-Evol...