Audo-Sight is presented, an AI-driven assistive system that spans across Edge-Cloud continuum and enables BLV individuals to perceive their surroundings through voice-based conversation and provides low-latency, accurate, and human-friendly responses through a novel mechanism that seamlessly fuses Edge and Cloud responses.
Abstract
Despite advances in assistive technologies, Blind and Low-Vision (BLV) individuals continue to face challenges in understanding their surroundings. Delivering concise, useful, and timely scene descriptions for ambient perception remains a long-standing problem in accessibility. Existing solutions often fail to identify user expectations for real-time and accessible responses. Moreover, for a given task, they either rely on cloud offloading, which imposes a significant delay, or edge-based AI, which often sacrifices accuracy. To address this, we present Audo-Sight, an AI-driven assistive system that spans across Edge-Cloud continuum and enables BLV individuals to perceive their surroundings through voice-based conversation. Audo-Sight provides low-latency, accurate, and human-friendly responses through a novel mechanism that seamlessly fuses Edge and Cloud responses. The system also addresses challenges in catering to BLV users through response editing informed by BLV needs. Audo-Sight orchestrates a set of AI models based on user query contextual analysis to infer intent and adjust for a variety of situations. In urgent cases where users require fast responses, Audo-Sight leverages parallel Edge and Cloud pipelines and seamlessly combines responses through its Response Fusion Engine. Systematic evaluation shows that Audo-Sight delivers speech output around 80% faster for urgent tasks and generates complete responses approximately 50% faster across all tasks compared to a commercial cloud-based solution---highlighting the need for customized AI-based solutions. Human evaluation of Audo-Sight shows that it is the preferred choice over GPT-5 for 62% of BLV participants with another 23% stating both perform comparably. Speed and interruption evaluations demonstrate that in most situations, the system can seamlessly respond at a rapid pace to keep up with BLV expectations.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.