Aug 2026· IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference· pp. 356-367· 0 citations· 37 references
Abstract
Sustainability regulations such as the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) and India's Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) act collectively define hundreds of disclosure requirements across fragmented documentations. At SAP, practitioners developing sustainability software struggle to verify regulatory coverage due to the complexity and interpretive demands involved. Our ambition is to develop a system that audits software features against regulatory requirements. This shall be achieved by retrieving relevant engineering artifacts to provide traceable evidence, with an exploratory transfer from ESRS to BRSR providing indication of cross-regulatory applicability as assessed by end users. To address this challenge, we worked in three phases: We conducted expert interviews identifying compliance verification challenges, developed then a generative AI (GenAI) supported auditing approach, before evaluating it with domain experts. Achieving successful results in 21 out of 39 cases on the test set using user documentation strengthens our confidence in that our approach is suitable to reduce manual effort. However, our evaluation also revealed a “trust gap”: despite strong performance, domain experts require human oversight for final compliance decisions due to high stakes and interpretive ambiguity. In this manuscript, we report on our work and share lessons learned and experiences we made in this context.
The European Union (EU) has emerged as a leading regulatory body in the development of sustainability and privacy regulations. While new regulation requirements vary, many include a documentation artifact to ensure compliance. Notably, the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) introduces Digital Product...
A. Watson, Marco Bücheler, Grant Richards· 0 citations
The results provide preliminary evidence that regulatory disqualification logic, particularly K.O. criteria, can prevent the selection of technically competitive models that nonetheless pose unacceptable compliance risks, demonstrating the feasibility of governance-oriented LLM selection in software engineering project...
J. Quintino, H. Moura, Filipe Calegario· 0 citations
Objective: This study aims to examine the development of academic literature on artificial intelligence (AI) competency, sustainability assurance quality, and the role of future-ready auditors in addressing the challenges of ESG governance and digital transformation in emerging markets.
Design/Methods/Approach: This st...
Prima Ayu Novita Junianto, D. Iswanto· Proceeding of International...· 0 citations
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance has shifted from voluntary best practice to enforceable legal obligation across major global jurisdictions. Frameworks such as the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the United...
Compliance reporting for well integrity remains narration-heavy, labour-intensive, and inconsistent across assets. This study develops a compliance-as-code approach that encodes integrity obligations (hazard identification, risk assessment, barrier verification, documentation) into 187 machine-checkable rules mapped...
O. Ogali, I. Okafor, E. Okoro et al.· SPE Nigeria Annual Internati...· 0 citations
A lifecycle-aware framework that integrates quantitative software quality assessment with Large Language Model (LLM)-based code refinement is proposed and the potential of metric-driven LLM feedback for research software quality improvement is demonstrated while highlighting its inherently multi-objective nature.
Nafis Tanveer Islam, N. Soveizi, Yutong Li et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.