Comparing two populations at the same physical covariate value requires more than conditional means or isolated target-point decisions: researchers may need evidence about an entire conditional-distribution ordering over a continuum, even when covariate margins differ. This paper makes that common-value comparison estimable under an explicit structure--flexibility tradeoff and turns the resulting surface into simultaneous evidence for first-order stochastic dominance. Population-specific margins map the common covariate value into each group, while a fitted copula-derivative representation links conditional distributions across the region. Uniform inference propagates uncertainty from both the margins and dependence model through a one-sided statistic with unknown binding locations. Under correct specification within a finite copula class, smoothness and trimming conditions, and a uniquely best candidate family, the procedure admits uniform control and consistent calibration. Simulations show increasing rejection as alternatives become more distinguishable, alongside model-selection sensitivity and small-sample size distortion. In a descriptive PSID application, the high--low parental-education comparison satisfies the two-direction criterion after multiplicity adjustment, whereas adjacent education-group comparisons remain inconclusive. The framework therefore supports region-wide distributional comparison while making its structural and inferential boundaries explicit.
A one-step estimator with K-fold cross-fitting and a U-statistic correction of the squared loss that removes the Monte Carlo bias of the naive plug-in is proposed, which is $\sqrt{n}$-consistent and asymptotically normal under double-robust rate conditions, and the resulting Wald interval attains nominal coverage.
A model-agnostic framework based on full conditional distributions distinguishes three statistically different failure modes: loss of dependence, record reuse, and mode concentration, and provides a principled basis for validating synthetic health, surveillance, and population data.
Many structural and dynamic economic models imply that key parameters are identified by conditional quantile restrictions. Building on the exponential-weighting approach of Bierens (1990) and recent advances in penalized maximum statistics for conditional moment restrictions (Chen et al., 2025), we develop a unified in...
We develop a rank-based framework for high-dimensional two-sample testing that detects marginal distributional differences beyond means and variances. Three marginal likelihood-ratio statistics generate SUM tests for widespread differences, MAX tests for concentrated departures, and Cauchy combinations for unknown sign...
Credibility theory combines individual experience with portfolio information for insurance pricing, but classical formulations focus primarily on conditional means and expected premiums. We propose a Dirichlet mixed-membership model (DMMM) for multivariate distributional credibility. Policyholder risk is represented by...
This paper proposes Wasserstein Causal Forests (WCF) for settings in which each unit's outcome is itself a probability distribution. This study also defines finite-grid transformed average and conditional average treatment effects, including a reference-distance contrast that asks whether treatment moves unit-level dis...
H. G. Souto· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.