Skip to content

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in additive manufacturing

Sep 2026

Abstract

The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in part with additive manufacturing (AM) is radically changing the functionality of advanced manufacturing technologies. The chapter includes a thorough analysis of the application of AI and ML approaches to some of the most important issues in AM, such as material development, process optimization, quality control, and defect detection. The review is the synthesis of current developments in several AM modes, such as powder bed fusion, directed energy deposition, and extrusion-based processing. Some of the main ML methods that have been discussed are convolutional neural networks to monitor objects visually, reinforcement learning to optimize parameters, and physics-informed surrogate models to predict material properties. This chapter also outlines a comprehensive discussion on AI-based material discovery models that combine high-throughput thermodynamic simulations with multiobjective optimization algorithms that show accelerations of alloy development cycles by orders of magnitude. The use of quality control applications is discussed in terms of real-time monitoring systems that achieve defect detection rates of more than 93% and reduce scan time by more than 90% with the help of AI-based computed tomography reconstruction. The closed-loop AI-AM model, consisting of design, process, monitoring, and control processes, is scheduled in a schematic diagram, and the overall table is used to find particular ML algorithms and AM applications with the performance metrics assigned to them. Nevertheless, in spite of the great progress, the issues of data sparseness, generalization of models, and real-time integration remain. Future trends are federated learning to achieve data privacy, digital twins to manage lifecycle, and autonomous manufacturing systems. The review offers the researcher and practitioners a systematic overview of the present state of affairs and future directions of the AI and AM intersection.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.