Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Humanᴬᴵ and Orgᴬᴵ Framework Calculator

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2 references

Abstract

Humanᴬᴵ and Orgᴬᴵ Framework Calculator is a local-first interpretive software companion to the whitepaper Humanᴬᴵ and Orgᴬᴵ: A Relational Framework for AI-Mediated Human and Organizational Capacity. Version 1.2.0 produces a reproducible and defensible assessment record for a bounded domain, an assessment that another party can reload, verify and contest. An exported record satisfies the whitepaper's minimum reporting convention on its own: unit analysed, task, context, AI configuration, observation period, validation method, and boundary of accountability. The calculator provides a structured implementation of six components of the framework: 1. Epistemic decoupling assessment;2. Propagation exposure analysis;3. Constitutive Orgᴬᴵ threshold assessment;4. Material AI contribution analysis;5. Humanᴬᴵ and Orgᴬᴵ relational synergy;6. Maturity classification. It additionally implements two constructs defined elsewhere in the same whitepaper, the classification worksheet and membership test, and the Orgᴬᴵ evaluation profile, together with anti-pattern detection read against the entered configuration. Section 11.5 of whitepaper v1.5 describes the 1.0.0 companion and predates this release; nothing is redefined here, and the accompanying README carries the reconciliation. Principal changes in 1.2.0. Material contribution is evaluated across all seven dimensions of the individual outcome profile rather than a single selected dimension, and is demonstrated when the declared threshold is exceeded on at least one relevant dimension; results are not compressed into a composite score.Epistemic decoupling is entered as counts over a declared task set and reported with a 95% confidence interval, so that a gap measured on few tasks is not presented as a demonstrated finding. Each organizational criterion carries an evidence reference and evidence type; a criterion declared demonstrated without a reference is reported as declared but undocumented and does not contribute to the threshold. Validated organizational learning is shown as the seventh, non-constitutive component of the organizational architecture, conditioning only the cumulative maturity state. Propagation exposure is computed for the current configuration and for the state after declared controls. Maturity is assigned per bounded domain, with domains in which AI is prohibited recorded as such rather than levelled. The assessment record uses JSON schema version 2 and can be reimported, including migration of records produced by versions 1.0.0 and 1.1.0. The interface prints the assessment as a standalone document. No formula defined in the whitepaper was altered, and the six assertions of the original test suite pass unmodified. The software is designed to support structured interpretation of user-entered evidence. It does not independently verify the accuracy, completeness, provenance, or sufficiency of that evidence. Calculations are performed locally in the user's browser. The application does not require user accounts, does not contain an application database, and does not transmit assessment data to a remote analysis service. This release makes no network request of any kind: typefaces are embedded in the file, so the calculator operates unchanged on an isolated network. Nothing is persisted in the browser. The self-hosted build carries a Content Security Policy with connect-src 'none', which allows these properties to be verified rather than assumed. Tests ship with the release and extract the implemented logic from the delivered file, so a passing run is a statement about the artefact itself. The calculator does not provide empirical validation, certification, legal advice, compliance determination, or an automated organizational decision. Its outputs must be interpreted in relation to the definitions, assumptions, boundaries, and limitations established in the accompanying whitepaper. The software is released under the MIT License, copyright S.C. PRODEFENCE S.R.L.The conceptual framework, definitions, variables, formulas, and interpretive text remain licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0 as published in the whitepaper; the software licence does not extend to them. The conceptual framework, definitions, variables, formulas, and interpretive model were developed by Alexandru Angheluș, an independent and self-funded author. Artificial intelligence and automation tools were used selectively to support software development, structural organization, language refinement, and verification activities. Responsibility for the conceptual model and the published software remains entirely with the author. Related whitepaper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22295278

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

GPT-Lab Sep 23, 2026

Requirements Don’t Live in Isolation: What We’re Exploring with Req-Space

Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…

GPT-Lab Sep 17, 2026

Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering

AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.