Skip to content

ESIC Series: Paper 8 Governance principles and considerations: Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative Governance Planning Group.

Sep 2026 · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · pp. 112528 · 0 citations
Medicine

Abstract

Objective

To develop guiding principles and governance options for the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) to ensure its effectiveness, legitimacy, and sustainability. STUDY

Design

AND

Setting

ESIC was established with Wellcome Trust funding to strengthen global evidence synthesis infrastructure and foster collaboration among researchers, funders, policymakers, and citizens. The ESIC Governance Planning Group (GPG) was tasked with designing a governance framework (during a six-month consultative phase) despite uncertainty about ESIC's future structure and functions. The GPG adopted a broad interpretation of 'governance', focusing on principles, potential functions, and high-level models rather than prescriptive structures. GPG activities included weekly meetings, online surveys, iterative drafting, external consultations, and an environmental scan of governance models in global non-profit organisations. Insights were synthesised through four stage reports and discussions during a face-to-face meeting at the end of the consultative phase.

Results

The GPG formulated guiding principles emphasising equity, transparency, agility, and subsidiarity. A four-quadrant framework was developed to classify ESIC functions: Connector (advocacy and partnerships), Participatory Platforms (inclusive engagement), Core Infrastructure (standards and tools), and Engine Rooms (regional technical support). Four governance models were assessed: federated, membership-based, flexible partnership, and rotational leadership. Two options were finally recommended: (1) a centralised shared-support body delivering Connector functions and coordinating other quadrants, or (2) a smaller network body with limited Connector roles. Both options were associated with modest costs vis-à-vis ESIC's projected budget.

Conclusion

Robust ESIC governance is critical to address inequities in the global evidence ecosystem. The GPG recommends phased implementation of a central support body alongside decentralised structures, guided by subsidiarity and inclusivity. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY The Governance Planning Group (GPG) developed principles and governance options for the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC). For this, the GPG first considered the potential functions and roles of ESIC, and then developed broad governance principles. These emphasized equity, transparency, agility, and subsidiarity. A four-quadrant framework was developed to classify ESIC functions as Connector (for advocacy and partnerships), Participatory Platforms (for inclusive engagement), Core Infrastructure (for standards and tools), and Engine Rooms (for regional technical support). Four governance models were explored, and finally two options were recommended viz. (1) a centralised shared support body delivering Connector functions and coordinating other quadrants, or (2) a smaller network body with limited Connector roles. Both options were associated with modest costs.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

ESIC Series: Paper 1 Introduction to the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) Planning Process Series.

The 21st century has seen exponential growth in evidence synthesis production, yet the global evidence ecosystem remains fragmented and inconsistently resourced, leaving persistent gaps that hamper effective responses to critical global challenges. In 2025, the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) was...

Z. Jordan, F. Campbell, P. Bragge · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

ESIC Series: Paper 11 Citizen Engagement in Evidence Synthesis: Recommendations from the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative.

AIM To describe how citizen engagement was integrated into the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) planning process, assess its influence on key outputs and reflect on the process and the implications for embedding meaningful citizen involvement in global evidence synthesis systems. BACKGROUND Citi...

Smith M, Morley Rf, Ebai-Atuh Ne et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Bridging sustainability and accountability: the role of ESG integration in corporate governance

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations are increasingly shaping corporate decision-making, influencing financial performance and stakeholder trust. This study examines how Ugandan firms integrate ESG principles into governance structures to enhance sustainability and long-term value creation. Us...

Mahadih Kyambade, Afulah Namatovu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

From SDG alignment to SDG-ready public administration: institutional capacity, collaborative governance, and trust in Portuguese sustainability governance

The 2030 Agenda has transformed sustainability from a planning and reporting agenda into a demanding public-administration challenge. Governments are expected not only to align policies with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but also to coordinate across administrative silos, manage goal interactions and trade-...

M. Asensio, Alexandra Ribeiro, Ricardo Dias · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

ESIC Series: Paper 7 Capacity sharing in Evidence Synthesis: Recommendations from the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC).

AIM To develop actionable recommendations for capacity sharing as a core enabler of a sustainable global evidence synthesis ecosystem. BACKGROUND The Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC), launched in 2024 with Wellcome Trust support, seeks to strengthen evidence synthesis methods, capacity, and infr...

Edward Kayongo, G. Fetensa, J. G. Nzweundji-Khumbah et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

ESIC Series: Paper 3 Strengthening demand-side engagement: Recommendations from the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) Working Group 1.

BACKGROUND A persistent challenge to evidence use is the disconnect between producers of evidence syntheses and users. This gap is driven by well-documented barriers faced by decision-makers, including limited access to high-quality or relevant evidence emanating from evaluation and research processes, findings not bei...

Paul Flowerdew, Eleanor B. Williams, Shelly-Ann Hunte et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.