Skip to content
#federated learning Dataset Open access

Dataset and Experimental Results: Robust Aggregation Ranks the Free-Rider First

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Prototype-based federated learning exchanges class-embedding matrices without exposing the computation that produced them. We evaluate three verification mechanisms against free-riding at this interface: robust aggregation used for contribution ranking, commitments to model behavior, and passport-derived identities. On CIFAR-100, Krum assigns a client that republishes the aggregate a detection AUC of 0.011, and distances from coordinate-wise median, trimmed-mean and Bulyan outputs yield 0.000. Exact score comparisons explain this inversion, and a matched-moment counterexample shows that no criterion based on the cohort mean and scalar dispersion can predict it. A prover with no model or data passes all 40 rounds of a behavioral-commitment verifier. In the passport installation map studied, 98.21% of passport dimensions lie in a nullspace and normalization adds a rescaling invariance, so one model yields many identities without establishing admission to a permissioned federation. A payload auditor over signed history detects six non-adaptive replay attacks across five held-out seeds, but also flags the honest client whose payload is copied, detects reduced training effort weakly, and is evaded by an attacker that evaluates its score. The results separate payload consistency, model identity and evidence that training occurred. Dataset Content: This repository contains the supplementary data and experimental assets to support and reproduce the results presented in the paper. Specifically, this dataset includes: Evaluation Results: The measured results supporting every table and figure in the manuscript, provided in JSON format. Archived Trajectories: Archived prototype trajectories that support the detector replay analyses. Model Checkpoints: Saved model checkpoints used for the passport-map measurements and inverse verifications.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.