Simulations demonstrate that TopoCompress effectively reduces cross-server traffic and deployment resource consumption while maintaining controllable inference quality, enabling efficient distributed MoE inference over bandwidth- and resource-constrained edge infrastructures.
Abstract
Mixture-of-experts (MoE) models improve capacity with moderate overhead by sparsely activating experts per token. However, deploying MoE across resource-constrained edge servers incurs substantial cross-server communication as experts are distributed across heterogeneous servers. Existing placement methods optimize for raw token traffic, while conventional compression considers semantics but ignores topology-dependent routing costs. Consequently, independent optimization leads to inefficient communication and resource utilization. This paper proposes TopoCompress, a deployment- and topology-aware token compression framework for communication-efficient distributed edge MoE inference. It jointly optimizes token compression, expert deployment/replication, GPU-CPU residency, and collaborative routing to balance cross-server transmission, quality, and resource use. To address the coupling between token-level compression and epoch-level deployment, TopoCompress employs a two-timescale alternating optimization. In the online fast loop, it identifies and compresses low-importance, high-routing-cost tokens and jointly routes surviving expert activations. In the offline slow loop, it updates expert placement, replication, and GPU-CPU residency according to post-compression traffic accumulated during online inference. We establish the feasibility, optimality, convergence, and computational complexity. Simulations demonstrate that TopoCompress effectively reduces cross-server traffic and deployment resource consumption while maintaining controllable inference quality, enabling efficient distributed MoE inference over bandwidth- and resource-constrained edge infrastructures.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
A study with 42 participants investigates the relationship between the affective states, creativity, and analytical problem-solving skills of software developers and offers support for the claim that happy developers are indeed better problem solvers in terms of their analytical abilities.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· PeerJ· 216 citations· ⚡13
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.