Skip to content

Concept Drift from a Causal Perspective

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 57 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work proposes a taxonomy that categorizes drift events by their causal origin, including changes in exogenous variables, endogenous mechanisms, confounders, and target-generating processes, and develops an SCM-based data stream generator that simulates controlled mechanism-level drift events.

Abstract

Concept drift is a common phenomenon in real-world data streams, in which changes in the data-generating distribution can degrade predictive model performance. Most existing definitions characterize drift as changes in the joint distribution $P(\mathbf{x}, y)$, without distinguishing which component of the data-generating process has changed. In this work, we introduce a causal perspective on concept drift based on Structural Causal Models (SCMs). We propose a taxonomy that categorizes drift events by their causal origin, including changes in exogenous variables, endogenous mechanisms, confounders, and target-generating processes. Building on this framework, we develop an SCM-based data stream generator that simulates controlled mechanism-level drift events. Our experiments empirically characterize the distributional effects of each drift type and show that drifts with different causal origins induce distinct patterns of distribution shift and predictive behavior. Furthermore, by integrating causal discovery methods, we use our framework to construct data streams grounded in real-world dependency structures, enabling more realistic and informative evaluation scenarios. We also demonstrate that leveraging the generated data can improve downstream performance. These results highlight the importance of accounting for causal structure when studying and evaluating adaptive learning methods, and establish a foundation for causally-aware evaluation in non-stationary environments.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Does Explainability Survive Data Drift?

Model performance monitoring is a standard practice in machine learning deployments. Detection performance is tracked continuously, and model decay is expected as the relationship between the feature and target variables degrades, a phenomenon known as concept drift. Explanation fidelity, however, is rarely monitored w...

Samuel Ozechi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

From Drift Detection to Diagnosis: An Explainable Framework for Deployed Machine Learning

A unified drift-aware framework for explainable diagnostics in deployed machine learning systems is proposed that can support proactive model monitoring and assist practitioners in deciding whether continued monitoring, investigation, recalibration, or model retraining is required.

Tambe Ankit Sampat · 0 citations

From Causal Structure to Conditional Generation

The results suggest that the architectural prior provides a useful organization of contextual information, while exposure to missing-modality cases is still needed for robust fallback when auxiliary inputs are absent.

Yu-Chen Guan, Chair Pradeep Ravikumar, Bryan Wilder · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

When AI Generates Covariates: Causal Typing and Estimand Drift in Sequential Experiments

AI-generated covariates from notes, conversations, images, and wearable streams can change the causal question when their roles are left unspecified. A generated feature may represent a treatment version, pre-action state, history, design variable, mediator, outcome proxy, observation process, or intercurrent event; th...

Takes Fujita, N. Hattori · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

LUCID: Learning Under Confounding for Inference and Discovery in Time Series

A regime-adaptive deconfounding layer that first estimates the confounding regime from data using a Mar\v{c}enko--Pastur spectral router, then applies a deconfounding strategy matched to that regime, which attenuates factor-dominated variation and recovers contemporaneous structure from the resulting innovations.

Mohammad Fesanghary · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.