Skip to content

Separators in Enhancing Autoregressive Pretraining for Vision Mamba

Mar 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2603.03806 · 0 citations · 52 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Under the evaluated four-image setting, these results indicate that separator-based long-sequence pretraining improves recognition robustness and dense visual prediction relative to ARM.

Abstract

The state space model Mamba has recently emerged as a promising paradigm in computer vision, attracting considerable attention for its efficient handling of long-sequence tasks. Its inherent causal structure makes it particularly well suited for autoregressive pretraining. However, existing autoregressive pretraining methods in vision are largely limited to short-sequence settings and may not fully use Mamba's capacity to model longer contexts. To investigate this setting, we introduce SeparaTors for AutoRegressive pretraining (STAR), a new autoregressive pretraining method for Vision Mamba that explicitly marks the boundaries between different images. STAR increases the patch-token sequence length from 144 to 640 by packing four images and four separator clusters. This is approximately $4.4\times$ the ARM patch-token sequence length. The increase is achieved without changing the resolution of any individual image: we use $192\times192$ inputs for autoregressive pretraining and $224\times224$ inputs for downstream classification fine-tuning. With this long-sequence pretraining scheme, STAR-B achieves 83.5\% EMA top-1 accuracy on ImageNet-1K after 1,600 epochs of pretraining. The learned representation also transfers beyond in-distribution classification: compared with ARM, STAR-B improves COCO box AP from 46.11 to 46.84 and mask AP from 40.74 to 41.45, while raising the mean top-1 accuracy across five ImageNet robustness benchmarks from 55.1\% to 56.8\%. Under the evaluated four-image setting, these results indicate that separator-based long-sequence pretraining improves recognition robustness and dense visual prediction relative to ARM.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.