Skip to content

Talk in Pieces, See in Whole: Disentangled and Hierarchical Representation Learning in Language-based Object Detection

Sep 2025 · 0 citations · 54 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The TaSe (Talk in Pieces, See in Whole) framework is introduced with three main contributions: a hierarchical synthetic captioning dataset spanning three tiers from category names to descriptive sentences; the three-component disentanglement module guided by a novel disentanglement loss function, transforms text embeddings into subspace compositions; and aggregating disentangled components into hierarchically structured embeddings guided by the proposed hierarchical objectives.

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced multimodal perception, demonstrated by open-vocabulary object detection with simple language queries. State-of-the-art VLMs still struggle to handle complex queries involving descriptive attributes and relational clauses. To address this problem, we propose restructuring linguistic representations according to the hierarchical relations within sentences for language-based object detection. A key insight is that textual tokens should be disentangled into core components-objects, attributes, and relations-and aggregated into hierarchically structured sentence-level representations. Building on this principle, we introduce the TaSe (Talk in Pieces, See in Whole) framework with three main contributions: (1) a hierarchical synthetic captioning dataset spanning three tiers from category names to descriptive sentences; (2) the three-component disentanglement module guided by a novel disentanglement loss function, transforms text embeddings into subspace compositions; and (3) aggregating disentangled components into hierarchically structured embeddings guided by the proposed hierarchical objectives. Experimental results under the OmniLabel benchmark show a 24% performance improvement, demonstrating the importance of linguistic compositionality.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.