Skip to content
Review Open access

Refining Assessment Design and Practice in Nursing and Midwifery Education in the Era of Generative AI: A Discussion Paper.

Aug 2026 · Journal of Clinical Nursing · 0 citations · 47 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Embedding structural changes within assessment design, rather than relying on rule enforcement, will ensure nursing and midwifery graduates are prepared to thrive in an AI-enabled world.

Abstract

Aims

This paper equips nursing and midwifery academics with strategies to assess student competence in an educational landscape shaped by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). It examines assessment design approaches, highlighting the shift from tasks reliant on unenforceable rules (discursive changes) toward redesigning assessment mechanics (structural changes) to preserve validity.

Background

The rapid adoption of GenAI tools like ChatGPT is transforming higher education, challenging assumptions about teaching, learning, and academic integrity. Traditional assessments are increasingly unsuited when AI can replicate student outputs. Rather than policing AI use, institutions must leverage its potential whilst ensuring assessment remains authentic, equitable, and valid.

Methods

A narrative review was undertaken, drawing upon peer-reviewed literature, expert commentary, and policy documents related to GenAI in nursing and midwifery education, emphasising assessment design and academic integrity.

Discussion

Two primary approaches are presented. Lane One creates GenAI-resistant tasks fostering higher-order thinking. Lane Two embraces human-AI collaboration, focusing on transparency, process, and developing evaluative judgement. A hybrid Lane Three allows conditional AI use within defined boundaries. Effective redesign requires structural, not merely discursive change, adopting systemic program-level assessment and clarifying acceptable AI use. Supporting staff and students through uncertainty is essential for sustainable reform.

Conclusion

Valid and ethical assessment in the GenAI era demands explicit institutional policies, clear communication, and rubrics promoting authentic learning. Embedding structural changes within assessment design, rather than relying on rule enforcement, will ensure nursing and midwifery graduates are prepared to thrive in an AI-enabled world. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Ensuring patient safety principles remain central to assessments whilst demanding that GenAI integration upholds professional standards will prepare nursing and midwifery graduates to thrive in an AI-enabled healthcare environment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

AI-driven Design Thinking and Service-Learning enhance nursing students’ evidence-based competencies in family healthcare delivery

Introduction: The integration of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) into nursing education faces challenges in linking theory to clinical application in complex family health contexts. Students struggle with efficiently accessing, appraising, and applying evidence influenced by sociocultural factors. Artificial intelligence...

Maria Graciela Villalba-Condori, Carla Cuya-Zevallos · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Theoretical assessment design at a South African school of nursing: A multimethod qualitative exploration

To improve the validity and reliability of theoretical assessments, nursing programmes should prioritise training in assessment design, strengthen alignment with learning outcomes, and implement moderation strategies to address inconsistencies.

G. Donough, K. Mthimunye, F. Daniels · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Nursing students' critical engagement with generative AI in evidence-based practice education: A qualitative descriptive study.

It is suggested that structured AI-comparison tasks offer the opportunity to develop AI and digital health literacy in nursing students and offer practical guidance for educators seeking to support graduates to be AI-critical and well-equipped to leverage the efficiencies of these tools.

Ashlyn Sahay, Adeniyi O Adeleye, Katrina Lane‐Krebs · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Future Midwife: A PRISMA Scoping Review of Education, Transition, and Work Readiness Among Midwifery Students

A unified educational framework that integrates these components is required to enable confident, adaptable, and practice-ready midwives, and to identify gaps in the existing literature to inform a coherent and future-ready educational framework.

Danielle Gleeson, Tracey Tulleners, Jessica Elliott et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Understanding Clinical Teaching in Midwifery Education: Validation of the MidPaACT Tool in the Italian Context

The Italian version of the MidPaACT demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties and provides a valid tool for the systematic evaluation of clinical teaching in midwifery education and can support the development of targeted faculty development initiatives and strengthen evidence-informed approaches to improving t...

S. Neri, Maria Panzeri, Margaret Smith et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Educators’ experiences transitioning from a traditional to an AI-aware assignment rubric: a qualitative study in a health and medicine course

The impact of transitioning from a traditional to an AI-aware rubric in a Health and Medicine course is evaluated, examining how this shift influenced educators’ grading practices, instructional strategies, and perceptions of student engagement.

Suzanne Estaphan, Tehzeeb Zulfiqar · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.