Skip to content

A DeepLabv3+ and CBAM based framework for multi-focus image fusion

Sep 2026 · Journal of Modern Optics · 63 references
Advanced Image Fusion Techniques

Abstract

Multi-focus Image Fusion (MFIF) technique aims to produce a full focused image that preserves the details from source images and enhance image fusion performance. A significant problem in MFIF is accurately segmenting the focused region particularly in complicated images with challenging boundaries. This limitation causes a loss of critical image information resulting in inferior fusion quality. The existing semantic segmentation methods such as FCN (Fully Convolutional Network), PSPNet (Pyramid Scene Parsing Network) and UNet frequently have difficulty with this task. To overcome these difficulties, this work presents a framework employing DeepLabv3+ architecture with Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), named DLCMF. The CBAM improves the framework's ability using channel and spatial attention to focus on key characteristics in an image, effectively capturing “what” and “where” to look in an image. This helps preserve edge details and improves feature extraction accuracy which decreases the loss of critical information during the process of fusion. To optimize training, both cross-entropy loss and dice loss functions are employed. The complementary source images are fed to DLCMF network which generates binary pair segmentation maps that are subsequently refined using morphological operations to yield final segmentation maps. Finally, the dot product is computed between the inputs and their corresponding binary map followed by a pixel-wise summation. Experimental findings indicate that DLCMF generates fused images of higher quality compared to those generated by other nine existing state-of-the-art methods.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.