A dual‐mode model is proposed in which folded domains contribute to chromatin anchoring at repressive regions, whereas intrinsically disordered regions support condensate‐associated organization at active developmental enhancers.
Abstract
Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) must preserve lineage identity while remaining responsive to developmental cues. Here, we discuss the hypothesis that ATRX condensates help organize enhancer‐centered nuclear microenvironments in NPCs. ATRX has long been studied in heterochromatin maintenance, histone variant deposition, and chromatin remodeling; earlier work has also shown that ATRX can occupy euchromatic and active regulatory regions and contribute to transcriptional regulation. Recent evidence in human NPCs indicates that ATRX forms nuclear puncta with condensate‐like properties, associates with neurogenic enhancer‐rich regions, and incorporates regulatory factors such as CHD7 and p300. Perturbation of ATRX condensate formation is associated with changes in enhancer‐associated ATRX occupancy, neural gene‐expression programs, and neuroepithelial organization, suggesting a regulatory mode that may complement canonical heterochromatin‐associated functions. We propose a dual‐mode model in which folded domains contribute to chromatin anchoring at repressive regions, whereas intrinsically disordered regions support condensate‐associated organization at active developmental enhancers. We emphasize that whether ATRX condensates activate enhancers de novo, stabilize pre‐existing enhancer states, buffer transcriptional variability, or primarily organize cofactor localization remains unresolved. We also discuss limitations of the current evidence and outline acute, locus‐specific experiments needed to test the model.
These findings reveal a previously unrecognized role for PRCs in establishing TAD-scale repressive chromatin domains during neuronal maturation, thereby safeguarding neuronal identity from external stimuli through broad silencing of alternative cell fate programs.
The findings uncover a non-canonical mechanism whereby a chromatin remodeler regulates transcription primarily through three-dimensional genome organization rather than local accessibility control, and establish histone modification-guided chromatin remodeling as a key principle in gene regulation.
Ming Yu, Jingdong Xue, Qi Zhang et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Precise three-dimensional (3D) genome organization is crucial for regulating gene expression during development, yet its role in age-related transcriptional changes and physiological decline remains elusive. Here, we show that aging reshapes chromatin architecture and gene regulation in murine naive CD4+ T cells, a qui...
Bao Wang, Lu-Zhang Ji, Q. Bian· Science Advances· 0 citations
Abstract LIN28A is a conserved RNA-binding protein essential for pluripotency, let-7 miRNA regulation, and cellular metabolism. However, the mechanisms controlling its transcriptional activation during early stem cell fate transitions remain poorly defined. Using the Lin28a locus as a model, we identified multiple intr...
It is shown that neuronal activation triggers genome-wide redistribution of CBP and p300 in hippocampal neurons, and KAT3 redistribution is identified as a key mechanism coupling neuronal activity to large-scale chromatin remodeling.
S. Niñerola, Beatriz del Blanco, Mirjam Cangonja et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
During development, cells balance proliferation and differentiation to generate diverse cell types, yet how these transitions are fine-tuned remains unclear. In the Arabidopsis leaf epidermis, stomata form through regulated cell division, whereas pavement cells and trichomes arise through differentiation, making this t...
Ansar Ali, Chi Kuan, Tsai-Chen Chen et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.