Skip to content

Selecting AI Solutions for Managing False Information During Disasters: A Prescriptive Recommendation Framework

Sep 2026 · Communications of International Proceedings
Public Relations and Crisis Communication Misinformation and Its Impacts

Abstract

Social media has become an essential communication tool during disaster situations. Unfortunately, it is also used to spread false information very rapidly. This includes rumors, outdated or misleading information, doctored images, and fake news stories. These can undermine and disrupt public trust and emergency response efforts and further endanger already impacted populations. Although research has addressed how AI can identify false information, much of it has focused on individual AI models. There remains a lack of prescriptive guidance to assist disaster management teams in selecting appropriate AI configurations for various types of disasters and false information. To address this, we propose a framework using a design science research approach. This paper reviews literature on disaster-related false information, AI-enabled misinformation detection, multimodal analysis, real-time adaptive models, cloud-based AI, federated learning, and Edge AI. We then provide a framework for three essential design tasks: mapping false information to disaster types, determining the factors that influence AI use in these situations, and recommending appropriate AI solutions. Our framework shows that different disaster contexts require different AI solutions. For instance, rapidly spreading text-based misinformation requires real-time natural language processing and network analysis, visual misinformation requires multimodal analysis and authenticity verification, privacy-sensitive disasters may require federated learning or Edge AI, and recurring disasters may benefit from cloud-based AI that facilitates the use of shared datasets. Overall, this research proposes a prescriptive artifact to help disaster managers select appropriate AI solutions to manage misinformation on social media during disasters.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.