Skip to content

Linguistic Features for Interpretable Textual Entailment

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 45 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

SLITE is presented, an explainable hybrid model for Recognizing Textual Entailment that integrates two complementary layers of semantic analysis: a structural-relational layer, based on semantic compatibility and incompatibility between compositional entities, and a distributional-informational layer, based on structured patterns of information change between embedding-based representations of the premise and the hypothesis.

Abstract

Despite the success of neural models in natural language processing, their black-box nature limits interpretability and conceals the linguistic phenomena underlying their predictions. We present SLITE, an explainable hybrid model for Recognizing Textual Entailment that integrates two complementary layers of semantic analysis: a structural-relational layer, based on semantic compatibility and incompatibility between compositional entities, and a distributional-informational layer, based on structured patterns of information change between embedding-based representations of the premise and the hypothesis. We propose 17 features that combine entity-level semantic relations, polarity-sensitive lexical matching, and alignment measures over semantic sub-representations of the similarity matrix, including measures based on entropy and transfer entropy. A logistic regression trained on these features achieves an accuracy of 83% on three-class SICK and 96% on SICK-CE, outperforming IsoLex by 4 percentage points and falling within 2 percentage points of RoBERTa with a fraction of its computational complexity. Ablation studies and SHAP analysis confirm that structural-relational features are the primary drivers of classification, while distributional-informational features provide essential complementary contributions, particularly for detecting neutrality and contradiction. Our results demonstrate that further exploration of hybrid approaches is a viable and scientifically productive alternative to massive neural architectures, and we hope they will strengthen the dialogue between linguistic theory and computational modeling of inference

View source

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Semantic Parsing for Evaluating Large Language Models: Separating Linguistic Abilities with YARN

A layer-wise analysis indicates that surface-level features such as temporality and negation are captured more reliably than deeper semantic phenomena like quantification in large language models, highlighting the limited capacity of current LLMs to generate fully formal meaning representations.

Rémi De Vergnette, Maxime Amblard · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Do General NLP Embeddings Capture Ontological Reasoning?

AVA is introduced, a systematic framework for evaluating whether embeddings distinguish logic-sensitive relational semantics in ontologies and knowledge graphs, and reveals a persistent gap between linguistic representation learning and ontology-level discrimination, challenging the assumption that strong NLP benchmark...

Hamed Babaei Giglou, Jennifer D'Souza, S. Auer · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The effect of syntactic and semantic information on word grounding through visual perception

Word grounding refers to the ability of agents to associate linguistic terms with the perceptual concepts they represent, such as color, shape, and spatial features. This study quantitatively evaluates how syntactic and semantic information affects word-grounding performance. We evaluated five configurations...

Saima Shaukat, A. Aly, Anouar Chibani et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Reversing Arrows in Large Language Models

This work presents the first systematic study of inverse relation directionality in LLMs, using a benchmark consisting of 5,457 instances spanning 27 distinct inverse relation labels and reveals systematic asymmetries in inverse relation classification across LLMs.

Sefika Efeoglu, Adrian Paschke · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings Revisited: Large Language Models Display Syntactic Bootstrapping

Syntactic bootstrapping (Gleitman, 1990) is the hypothesis that children use the syntactic environments in which a verb occurs to learn its meaning. Existing evidence for this hypothesis generally involves controlled experimental settings (e.g., Jin & Fisher, 2014; Naigles, 1990; Yuan et al., 2012). In this paper, we...

Xiao-Meng Zhu, R. Thomas McCoy, Robert Frank · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

Representation of syntax in LLMs through the lens of linear distance and similarity-aware entropy

Two factors are identified that predict most of UASL's variability across relations: the mean and dispersion of the linear distance between the related words, and the diversity of the diversity of the syntactic relation's head.

Juan Pablo Vigneaux, M. Kennedy, Khalil Iskarous et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 24, 2026

Estimating suicide risk from text

A new language-processing tool could help identify the highest-risk individuals from natural language, enabling swifter interventions.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.