Skip to content

Distilling Temporal Search and Reasoning: Evolving LLMs for Future Prediction via Harness-Assisted Efficient Data Synthesis

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.25554 · 0 citations · 38 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A time-truncation harness is proposed that enforces a temporal cut-off at every turn, enabling TIR-style sampling from historical events, enabling TIR-style sampling from historical events, reducing temporal leakage and reliance of rejection sampling or unsolved queries, increasing the sampling efficiency.

Abstract

Future event prediction carries broad social impact yet remains challenging. SOTA approaches augment LLMs with external agent frameworks whose predictive capability vanishes once the harness is removed. While recent Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) internalizes deep search for multi-hop retrieval of facts, forecasting further demands temporal search and reasoning over historical trends and dynamic shifts. The key obstacle is data: historical queries induce temporal leakage that degrades forecasting into retrieval. Prior works either freeze information gathering with static observations, or rely on rejection sampling or unresolved fresh queries that discard vast amounts of data, degrading synthesis efficiency. We propose a time-truncation harness that enforces a temporal cut-off at every turn, enabling TIR-style sampling from historical events, reducing temporal leakage and reliance of rejection sampling or unsolved queries, increasing the sampling efficiency. We further build a large-scale corpus and a process-based metric and show that our harness naturally induces a broader temporal breadth of search and raises the proportion of high-quality data, further increasing the efficiency and reducing the reliance on complex rubrics. Distillation experiments show that students trained on harness-intervened data achieve the best performance, demonstrating harness-assisted model evolving that turns higher quality temporal search and reasoning data into a parametric advancement of the students.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

LexiHorizon: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for Long-Horizon Deep Search

Deep search agents tackle complex knowledge tasks through iterative retrieval, multi-hop reasoning, and evidence synthesis across multiple sources. Existing approaches typically assume relatively stable retrieval systems and operate over short-horizon tool interaction. However, when retrieval is sensitive to query form...

Zhi-Qing Nong, Liang Wen, Chao-Hsuan Liu · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Self-Correcting Long-Horizon Search Agents via Tree-Structured Memory

Experiments establish ReTree as an effective self-correcting memory abstraction for long-horizon search, and show that ReTree consistently outperforms Full-Trajectory ReAct in question-answering and search benchmarks.

Aijun Yang, Qianxue Guo, Ziyi Huang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Synthetic Worlds for Temporal Evaluation and Knowledge Updating in LLMs

This work proposes a synthetic, simulation-driven framework for studying knowledge insertion in LLMs, and introduces {\sc ParallelEvents}, a benchmark of fictional yet realistic future worlds that generates coherent event trajectories for controlled evaluation, avoiding contamination while preserving consistency.

Jonathan Zheng, Zi-Rui Shao, Alan Ritter et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

When Can Agents Forget Their Reasoning? ICLR for Long-Horizon Agent Context Compression

Results characterize agent reasoning as dynamic working state rather than permanent interaction history, and suggest that historical reasoning becomes more replaceable once task relevant derived state has been reliably externalized into code, files, tool outputs, or environmental feedback.

Ming-Xuan Wang, Fei Luo, Bo Wang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

ThinkRetrieve: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning Traces for Test-Time Scaling

ThinkRetrieve is proposed, a test-time scaling framework that augments the reasoning traces of LRMs with dynamically retrieved solved examples at each reasoning step, providing the model with guidance on how to reason rather than merely what facts are relevant.

Vaibhav Singh, Soumya Suvra Ghosal, Sarvesh Gharat et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.