Skip to content

Traits Run Deeper: Trait-Specific Asymmetric Fusion for Multimodal Personality Assessment

Jia Li Qian Chen Wei Wang Xinyu Li Zhenzhen Hu Dongsheng Shao Richang Hong Meng Wang
Sep 2026
Computer Vision Human-computer Interaction

Abstract

Personality assessment aims to infer stable traits from dynamic behaviors across modalities like language, voice, and facial expressions. Existing approaches often adopt a uniform multimodal fusion strategy for all personality dimensions, overlooking trait-specific modality preferences and causing cross-modal interference. To address this, we propose Traits Run Deeper, a novel personality assessment framework consisting of three components. First, the Multimodal Foundation Representation (MFR) module constructs personality-oriented inputs and incorporates psychology-informed semantic templates as anchors, enabling foundation models to capture trait-relevant behaviors. Second, the Trait-Specific Modality Fusion (TSMF) module employs an asymmetric fusion mechanism, allowing each dimension to selectively exploit different modality pathways to capture heterogeneous preferences while reducing cross-modal contamination. Third, the Distribution-Calibrated Personality Regression (DCPR) module mitigates label imbalance and central tendency bias through target distribution calibration, improving robustness and stability. Experimental results on the AVI Challenge 2026 validation set show that our framework reduces mean squared error (MSE) by approximately 25% compared with the baseline. Consistent improvements on the official test set demonstrate that our method achieves the best performance and ranks first in the AVI Challenge 2026 Personality Assessment Track. The source code will be made available at [https://github.com/MSA-LMC/TraitsRunDeeper](https://github.com/MSA-LMC/TraitsRunDeeper).

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.