Feb 2026· Proceedings of the 28th International Conference On Multimodal Interaction· 0 citations· 88 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
CHORUS is a mixed-initiative system designed to support translators’ workflow while preserving their personal style that reduces completion time, lowered translators’ cognitive effort, and improved final translation quality measured by the automatic metrics BLEU and COMET.
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of automatic AI translation systems in daily language tasks, their limitations become apparent in professional translation contexts, where human expertise remains crucial. Professionals rarely rely on these systems in their practice due to a lack of detailed support for the translation process, matching professional styles, and accountability for the final outcome. To bridge this gap, we present CHORUS, a mixed-initiative system designed to support translators’ workflow while preserving their personal style. The system adapts through behavioral interaction signals, such as keystrokes, pauses, and editing effort. A formative study found that incorporating MQM theory may be beneficial for professional translation, and the system should adapt to each individual translator’s idiosyncratic traits. The final within-subject study with 30 licensed English–Chinese translators found that our system reduced completion time by 33.8%, lowered translators’ cognitive effort, and improved final translation quality measured by the automatic metrics BLEU and COMET. Participants also reported that the system made translation issues easier to inspect, reduced repeated prompting compared to a chat-interface LLM, and offered reflections on their habits and traits. Our findings illustrate how multi-agent AI systems can be designed to support expert workflows and their potential for professional use.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 7, 2026
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.