The results show that learning under an appropriate prior overcomes the curse of dimensionality with respect to the dependence on $n$ and introduces the class of sparse priors and defines the "Sparse Dimension" as a measure of sparsity of a prior over the space of all distributions.
Abstract
Despite the widespread use and success of generative AI techniques today, theoretical guarantees on learning a distribution supported in $d$ dimensions from $n$ samples degrade as $O(n^{-1/\Theta(d)})$, though shown to be minimax optimal. We hypothesize that present bounds are too pessimistic because smoothness assumptions are not enough to capture the structure of distributions that often appear in real applications. Consequently, we introduce the class of sparse priors and define the"Sparse Dimension"as a measure of sparsity of a prior over the space of all distributions. We show that distribution learning under a $k$-sparse prior achieves a Bayesian risk lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{k/n})$ under common distance metrics, and show a matching (up to logarithmic terms asymptotically in $n,k$) upper bound for the TV distance under mild additional assumptions. We show the statistical equivalence of distribution learning and learning to sample in the Bayesian setting so that our results apply to learning to sample as well. While $k$ can still depend on the dimension $d$, or a notion of intrinsic dimension, our results show that learning under an appropriate prior overcomes the curse of dimensionality with respect to the dependence on $n$.
The nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) of a Gaussian location mixture maximizes the likelihood over the infinite-dimensional space of mixing distributions. The maximizing mixing distribution can be nonunique, and the classical bound on its number of atoms grows linearly with the sample size $n$. We show...
We study how the response of a Bayesian posterior statistic to future observations changes as information accumulates. For a non-decreasing function $T$, define $\Pi_n^T=\E[T(\Theta)\vert \mathcal F_n]$, where $\Theta$ has an arbitrary prior and the observations come from a one-parameter exponential family. Conditionin...
The no-data criterion is a safe default, matching or improving on truncation for HSGP, VFF and VISH, with substantial gains for VISH and improvements over a recently developed selection heuristic for that basis family.
This work introduces a variant of the Thompson Sampling algorithm that uses a fractional or $\alpha$-posterior instead of the standard posterior, and identifies general regularity conditions on the prior and reward distributions that enable a regret analysis of $\alpha$-TS without assuming any tractable approximation o...
Prateek Jaiswal, D. Pati, A. Bhattacharya et al.· 0 citations
It is proved that an unbounded gap between the update maps can coexist with vanishing predictive KL for every fixed finite $K\ge2$ in a stationary symmetric Gaussian HMM, and isolates two missing links between internal update gaps and predictive cost.
Qi-Fu Wen, Shuai Liu, Zihan Zhou et al.· 0 citations
Given $[0,1]$-valued random variables $X_1,\dots,X_n$ such that $\mathbb{E}[X_i | X_1,\dots,X_{i-1}]= \mu$ for all $i$, we propose a new nonasymptotic confidence interval for $\mu$ that is obtained by inverting terminal e-values generated by a novel betting strategy. When the data are iid, its limiting width matches th...
Diego Martinez-Taboada, Aaditya Ramdas· 1 citation
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.