Skip to content

Sparse Priors for Efficient Distribution Learning

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 35 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

The results show that learning under an appropriate prior overcomes the curse of dimensionality with respect to the dependence on $n$ and introduces the class of sparse priors and defines the "Sparse Dimension" as a measure of sparsity of a prior over the space of all distributions.

Abstract

Despite the widespread use and success of generative AI techniques today, theoretical guarantees on learning a distribution supported in $d$ dimensions from $n$ samples degrade as $O(n^{-1/\Theta(d)})$, though shown to be minimax optimal. We hypothesize that present bounds are too pessimistic because smoothness assumptions are not enough to capture the structure of distributions that often appear in real applications. Consequently, we introduce the class of sparse priors and define the"Sparse Dimension"as a measure of sparsity of a prior over the space of all distributions. We show that distribution learning under a $k$-sparse prior achieves a Bayesian risk lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{k/n})$ under common distance metrics, and show a matching (up to logarithmic terms asymptotically in $n,k$) upper bound for the TV distance under mild additional assumptions. We show the statistical equivalence of distribution learning and learning to sample in the Bayesian setting so that our results apply to learning to sample as well. While $k$ can still depend on the dimension $d$, or a notion of intrinsic dimension, our results show that learning under an appropriate prior overcomes the curse of dimensionality with respect to the dependence on $n$.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Polylogarithmic Sparsity of Randomly Reweighted NPMLEs for Gaussian Mixtures

The nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) of a Gaussian location mixture maximizes the likelihood over the infinite-dimensional space of mixing distributions. The maximizing mixing distribution can be nonunique, and the classical bound on its number of atoms grows linearly with the sample size $n$. We show...

Han-Sheng Jiang · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Convex order and preservation of convexity for Bayesian posterior updates

We study how the response of a Bayesian posterior statistic to future observations changes as information accumulates. For a non-decreasing function $T$, define $\Pi_n^T=\E[T(\Theta)\vert \mathcal F_n]$, where $\Theta$ has an arbitrary prior and the observations come from a one-parameter exponential family. Conditionin...

Erhan Bayraktar, Yu-Qiong Wang · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

On Basis Function Selection for Sparse Gaussian Process Regression

The no-data criterion is a safe default, matching or improving on truncation for HSGP, VFF and VISH, with substantial gains for VISH and improvements over a recently developed selection heuristic for that basis family.

Marnix Van Soom, I. De Boi · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Posterior Tempering Explains Variance Inflation in Linear and Generalized Linear Thompson Sampling

This work introduces a variant of the Thompson Sampling algorithm that uses a fractional or $\alpha$-posterior instead of the standard posterior, and identifies general regularity conditions on the prior and reward distributions that enable a regret analysis of $\alpha$-TS without assuming any tractable approximation o...

Prateek Jaiswal, D. Pati, A. Bhattacharya et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Gaussian-efficient testing by betting on the mean of bounded data

Given $[0,1]$-valued random variables $X_1,\dots,X_n$ such that $\mathbb{E}[X_i | X_1,\dots,X_{i-1}]= \mu$ for all $i$, we propose a new nonasymptotic confidence interval for $\mu$ that is obtained by inverting terminal e-values generated by a novel betting strategy. When the data are iid, its limiting width matches th...

Diego Martinez-Taboada, Aaditya Ramdas · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.