Skip to content

GeoSelect: Spatial-Program Execution for Training-Free Referring Remote Sensing Image Segmentation

Yuhang Jiang Guohui Deng Miaozhong Xu Chao Ruan Jinling Zhao Linsheng Huang
Sep 2026
Artificial Intelligence Computer Vision

Abstract

Referring remote sensing image segmentation segments the object named by a natural-language expression in an aerial image. Existing training-free methods resolve the expression through implicit vision-language activations or region-text similarity, which gives weak control over the spatial, superlative, and ordinal relations that dominate aerial referring, such as the rightmost ship or the second court from the left. We propose GeoSelect, a training-free pipeline that reframes referring as the execution of a typed spatial program. A frozen, text-only language model synthesises the expression into a small domain-specific language, a well-formedness checker accepts the program, and a deterministic executor runs it. The central abstraction is a single scored candidate set type under which every operator composes: continuous geometric fields realise position and proximity, while discrete set and order operators add the extremum, ordinal, top-k, and relational constructions that fields alone cannot express. Execution is explicit, so every intermediate is inspectable, and a reliability ladder degrades any failing program to the field-only special case. GeoSelect achieves 58.86 mIoU on RRSIS-D test and 55.27 mIoU on RISBench test, more than twice the best prior training-free method on RRSIS-D, with no referring supervision and on a single GPU. Under a fixed detector and segmenter, explicit execution improves over implicit selectors under the same backbone; the best-box-IoU and outcome-partition diagnostics motivate complementary tests of proposal recall and program-path behaviour, with the program path the clearer priority on RISBench, and an exposure audit shows comparable accuracy on the audited unseen subset. Code and configurations are available at https://github.com/Avalon-S/GeoSelect.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.