Multiple learning processes contribute to successful goal-directed actions under changing physiological states, biomechanical constraints, and environmental contexts. Among these, explicit strategies enable us to discover new movement patterns when existing ones no longer achieve the desired outcome. Yet, how strategies are discovered during motor learning remains unknown. To address this, we developed a novel behavioral paradigm that isolates strategy discovery in response to a range of visuomotor perturbations. This approach revealed that strategy discovery unfolds through an initial period of systematic exploration across multiple candidate strategies, followed by an “aha” moment in which behavior converges on a stable solution. To account for these dynamics, we developed a computational model based on hypothesis testing in which learners generate and evaluate visuomotor rules to counteract the perturbation. This hypothesis testing model outperformed a range of alternative accounts, including gradual error reduction, win-stay lose-shift learning, and sudden one-shot insight. Together, these findings identify hypothesis testing as a computational mechanism by which humans discover new strategies during motor learning.
Motor adaptation is typically studied using limb-based perturbations in highly constrained tasks. However, everyday actions require compensating for uncertain environmental dynamics impacting manipulated objects within redundant execution spaces, where multiple combinations of variables can achieve success. To investig...
Jacob J. Boulrice, B. '. 't Hart, D. Y. P. Henriques· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The sensorimotor system is continuously adjusted to minimize error. Current theories assume that this adaptation process entails the operation of multiple learning systems, with a key division between implicit and explicit components. Recent studies have revealed several inconsistencies regarding the characteristics an...
Tian-He Wang, Tony Lam, Jordan A. Taylor et al.· PLoS Biology· 0 citations
Movement variability can either facilitate or impede motor learning, dependent on the context of the learning environment. Most previous studies have evaluated reward- or reinforcement-based learning paradigms with a clear task goal and/or extrinsic feedback. We assessed the effect of movement variability when learning...
M. Beerse, K. Bigelow, Joaquin A. Barrios· Human Movement Science· 0 citations
Learning sensorimotor contingencies-that is, the link between one's actions and their sensory effects-is fundamental to developing body knowledge, understanding causality, and developing a sense of agency. In developmental psychology, this process is classically studied using the mobile paradigm, where infants learn th...
Accurate motor behavior relies on our ability to refine movements based on errors. Sensory prediction errors (SPEs), arising from discrepancies between expected and actual sensory feedback are a primary driver of motor adaptation. Task performance errors (TPEs), reflecting failures to achieve movement goals, also influ...
Gaurav Panthi, P. Mutha· Journal of Neuroscience· 0 citations
Understanding how the brain supports flexible, goal-directed behavior is a central aim of neuroscience. Yet such behavior is highly variable and unfolds over long timescales, making it challenging to understand its organization. Advances in behavioral tracking quantify movements but do not reveal the objectives that gu...
Aditi Jha, Keyue Sky Shi, Kara A. Fulton et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.