Skip to content
Review

Rinser: Deriving Succinct Evidence for Automated Code Reviews

· 0 citations · 38 references

TL;DR

Rinser is a tool developed at Amazon to ease user interaction with static analysis results presented in code reviews and is able to produce traces on average 10x shorter than Infer traces in under 6 seconds on average due the the removal of irrelevant information.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Sep 2026

On-Device GitHub Contributions Audit utilizing Recursive Language Models

Senior engineers must verify what developers built, but evidence is buried in commit histories, too voluminous to review manually. This code is often confidential, ruling out cloud services, yet local models cannot fit a repository in context. We present an on-device Recursive Language Model (RLM) for GitHub contributi...

Christian Luis Effendy, Davin Djayadi, Pelangi Masita Wati et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

After the Hitchhiker’s Guide: Toward Principled LLM Assistance for Static Analysis

Practical static analysis of large systems such as the Linux kernel often depends on information that is difficult to capture precisely and on identifying the parts of a large codebase where precise reasoning is needed. This dissertation studies how LLMs can complement static analysis through two roles: specification r...

Hao-Nan Li · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Measuring the Cost of Prompt Structure in LLM Code Generation

Structured prompting routinely improves general LLM reasoning, but whether it transfers to code generation remains underexplored even as coding tools add template layers around user requests. We compare three levels of automatically imposed prompt structure, from free-form instructions over a static component template...

Yue-Tian Mao · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An Exploratory Study on Code Smells Detection and Refactoring using LLMs

This paper focuses on four common smells and considers five prompts of diverse complexity, asking the model for detecting and removing the identified code smells, and suggests that general-purpose LLMs cannot be reliably used for that.

Giorgia Paisi, Francesca Arcelli Fontana, Bartosz Walter · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Between the Commits: Process, Error, and Claim Reliability in a Wholly AI-Authored Codebase

We present: (i) a new dataset consisting of the full development history of a 21,000-line Python tool built entirely by Claude AI, with no human-authored code or tests, (ii) two code-provenance tracing tools, (iii) three taxonomies for instruction intent, commit provenance, and response reliability, (iv) application of...

D. Leith · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.