Skip to content
Review

Advances in AI's Future in Toxicology: Integrating Computational Prediction and Clinical Translation Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Aug 2026 · International journal of toxicology · pp. 10915818261476966 · 0 citations · 28 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Current AI-based approaches for toxicity prediction are summarized, the interpretability challenges that hinder their practical implementation are examined, and the emerging role of XAI is highlighted in bridging the gap between computational prediction and clinical application are highlighted.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are increasingly used in toxicological risk assessment to predict chemical toxicity, identify hazardous compounds, and support regulatory decision-making. However, the widespread adoption of these models is limited by their "black-box" nature, which reduces interpretability, transparency, and regulatory confidence. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges by revealing how input features, including chemical structures, exposure levels, and biological pathways, contribute to toxicity predictions. Techniques such as SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) provide interpretable insights into model decision-making and enhance trustworthiness, accountability, and mechanistic understanding. Despite these advances, most XAI applications in toxicology remain at the computational or preclinical stage, with limited clinical and regulatory translation. This review summarizes current AI-based approaches for toxicity prediction, examines the interpretability challenges that hinder their practical implementation, and highlights the emerging role of XAI in bridging the gap between computational prediction and clinical application. Greater standardization, integration of human data, and collaboration among academia, industry, and regulatory agencies will be essential for advancing transparent and clinically actionable toxicology models.

View source

Similar papers

Review Sep 2026

Artificial intelligence in toxicology: current advances, challenges and future directions.

This review critically evaluates the evidence base for AI-based toxicity prediction, assesses current challenges and considers the trajectory toward next-generation risk assessment, which requires adherence to the TREAT validation principles and sustained regulatory engagement.

Kamil Kuča, Siddhi Otari, Namrata Singh et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Integrating New Approach Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence to Advance Central Nervous System Toxicity Prediction: Lessons from Preclinical and Clinical Case Studies.

Central nervous system (CNS) toxicities remain a major cause of drug attrition and represent a persistent challenge in predicting neurological risk during drug development. Limitations in the predictive resolution and translational relevance of conventional nonclinical paradigms contribute to uncertainty in identifying...

Mamta Behl, Fiona S Daly, H. Hogberg et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Explainable artificial intelligence in medical imaging: how to interpret, evaluate, and use artificial intelligence explanations.

An accessible overview of XAI is provided, including saliency maps, perturbation-based and feature-attribution approaches, concept- based methods, and example-based reasoning, as well as uncertainty quantification as a complementary approach for assessing prediction reliability, along with common misconceptions and eme...

Gorkem Durak, H. Aktas, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Predictive Safety in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Promises, Limits, and the Case for an Enterprise Lifecycle Evidence Ecosystem.

Predictive safety is used primarily to mean product-level and population- or subgroup-level anticipation of plausible treatment-related harm, rather than an autonomous patient-level clinical decision-making approach.

Tarek A. Hammad, Justine Rochon, Kate Gofman et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Shaping the Future of Predictive Toxicology with Machine and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Review

This review discusses recent progress in ML, DL, and AI-based strategies for toxicity prediction, assesses their utility across major toxicity endpoints, and highlights the challenges and future research opportunities in predictive toxicology.

Anjali Mahavar, Atul Patel, Ashish Patel · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignancy with high global incidence and mortality, whose significant heterogeneity and poor prognosis pose severe clinical challenges. While artificial intelligence (AI) shows potential in HCC imaging, pathology, and prognosis, its “black-box” nature limits clinical adoption. Expla...

Yue-Hua Li, Pengfei Li · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.