This work presents XAgent, an execution-guided agentic framework that analyzes dynamic behavior and additional program context to localize and validate issues, opening new opportunities for LLM-based coding agents to achieve more robust and generalizable software maintenance.
Abstract
Agentic AI has enabled capabilities in leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously resolve repository-level GitHub issues. However, due to the reliance on limited static description of issues, existing agentic approaches suffer from incorrect localization and incomplete validation. Solely relying on this information can bias LLM reasoning toward the narrow scope of the issue description, leading to incomplete patches that fail to address the underlying issue. In this paper, we present XAgent, an execution-guided agentic framework that analyzes dynamic behavior and additional program context to localize and validate issues. The experimental results on the SWE-bench-lite dataset demonstrate that XAgent outperforms other existing approaches, achieving a resolve rate of 62.0% and a function localization accuracy of 72.8%, while maintaining cost efficiency. Our analysis further shows that XAgent successfully resolves 7 additional issues that the top existing baselines fail to address. This work highlights a shift from static, description-oriented patch generation toward dynamic execution-guided issue resolution, opening new opportunities for LLM-based coding agents to achieve more robust and generalizable software maintenance.
ParaRecover is introduced, a process-level benchmark for evaluating error localization and recovery in multi-turn parallel tool-use agents, and the SDE rubric is proposed, which measures structural integrity, diagnostic reasoning, and evolutionary strategy during agent execution.
The results support treating repository exploration as an independently measurable and budgetable stage of modular coding agents, with explorer selection guided by the downstream handoff contract.
This paper proposes AgentExecutor, a novel multi-agent framework for partial code execution that is Supported by the power of LLM agents who can think, act, and get feedback iteratively, and is able to autonomously explore a richer action space, enabling diverse operations such as creating resource files and resolving...
Junkai Chen, Cheng-Ran Yang, Xing Hu et al.· 0 citations
ZhuLong is presented, an execution-grounded LLM coding agent for PyAether and SKILL that combines API retrieval, documentation inspection, and sandbox execution via unified MCP tools, augmented by an offline API self-exploration mechanism that infers undocumented API behaviors through counterfactual experimentation.
Yang Liu, Shiwei Hou, Xi-Yuan Chen et al.· 1 citation
The results support interpreting AgentBetta as a configuration-adaptation mechanism that regulates capability allocation and inference expenditure rather than as a universal replacement for specialized agent architectures.
AFANet is introduced, a lightweight graph-based framework that models interaction trajectories through step-level semantic signals and agent-level relationships and suggests that effective agent failure attribution does not require heavy LLM reasoning and a lightweight, structured approach can achieve strong performanc...
Ting-Wei Li, Yuan-Chen Bei, Xiao Lin et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.