Skip to content
Review Open access

Impact of Decision Aids for Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Aug 2026 · Current Oncology · Vol 33, pp. 518 · 0 citations · 72 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Overall, Patient Decision Aids were associated with better knowledge, less decisional conflict and greater satisfaction with the decision-making process, and some studies also suggested benefits for women with lower health literacy or socioeconomic status, especially when the aids used pictures or simple language.

Abstract

Simple Summary Women with early stage breast cancer often need to choose between several treatment options, and these decisions can be difficult and stressful. Patient Decision Aids are tools designed to support these choices by providing clear, evidence-based information and helping patients think about what matters most to them. In this systematic review, we analyzed 26 studies involving 5174 women with early stage breast cancer to evaluate whether these aids improve decision-making, knowledge, psychological well-being and quality of life, while also gathering qualitative data regarding the acceptability and feasibility of these tools. We also dedicated a special focus to undeserving or lower health literacy populations. Overall, Patient Decision Aids were associated with better knowledge, less decisional conflict and greater satisfaction with the decision-making process. Some studies also suggested benefits for women with lower health literacy or socioeconomic status, especially when the aids used pictures or simple language. However, effects on anxiety, depression and quality of life were less consistent. These findings suggest that Patient Decision Aids can be useful tools in breast cancer care, but their impact depends on how they are designed and implemented.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Barriers and Facilitators to Shared Decision-Making in EGFRm Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Patient Perspectives

Introduction The Global Lung Cancer Coalition Patient Charter highlights that every patient should have involvement in decision-making. In lung cancer, patient involvement in treatment decision-making is often perceived as difficult to achieve. Purpose This study explored the experiences of patients with epidermal grow...

V. Harrison, Gerald Goh · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Decision-making capacity, distress and decisional conflicts of patients with advanced cancer at the time of consent: empirical findings and ethical implications

The ability of cancer patients to make informed decisions may be limited due to psychological and emotional stress. The aim of this study is to describe the decision-making capacity of patients with advanced cancer and explore possible associations with their psychological health and decisional conflict. W...

S. Sommerlatte, Theresa Schneider, Julia Haberstroh et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

“Someone could have told me”: a qualitative study on experiences with hysterectomy decision-making and regret in Mysore, India

Introduction Hysterectomy is a common surgery among women in India and has been normalized as a treatment for a range of conditions including those with alternative treatment options. There are concerns regarding its overuse, appropriateness, and potential contribution to poor health outcomes, especially among younger...

S. Herbst de Cortina, Raghavi Karanam, Rashmi Pramathesh et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Clinicians' Perception and Management of Cancer Patients' Decision Making Burden.

Clinicians' responses to perceived decision making burden in patients were variable, and discussions about how to navigate tensions between autonomy and avoiding harm could foster greater unity among clinicians on addressing patients' burden in SDM.

F. Huijgens, Inge Henselmans, M. Huisinga et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.