Skip to content
Open access

Development and Validation of a Metastatic Breast Cancer-Specific Prognostic Model Using CancerLinQ Discovery.

Sep 2026 · JCO Oncology Practice · pp. OP2500610 · 0 citations · 41 references
Medicine

TL;DR

An electronic health record-based prognostic model is developed to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer at high risk of near-term death and can predict risk of death within 30 and 90 days for patients with MBC.

Abstract

Purpose

Oncologists struggle to know which patients are near end of life to enable timely transitions to supportive care. We developed an electronic health record-based prognostic model to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) at high risk of near-term death.

Methods

For model development, we identified patients with MBC in CancerLinQ Discovery, 2000-2020. We randomly selected one encounter per patient, allocating encounters to training (70%) and test (30%) data sets. We evaluated candidate predictors of death within 30 and 90 days using logistic regression, including age, vital signs, laboratory values, performance status, time since last chemotherapy, and tumor phenotype. We varied the alert rate (ie, high-risk proportion) from 5% to 40% and evaluated performance for 30- and 90-day outcomes at each rate. We conducted external validation using an integrated health system database.

Results

We identified 9,270 patients with MBC. Significant predictors of mortality were lower sodium, albumin, or pulse oximetry; higher alkaline phosphatase, aspartate transaminase, white blood cell count, creatinine, or pulse rate; decrease in body mass; poor performance status; opioid use; and recent chemotherapy discontinuation. For 90-day mortality, in the internal test set, models had a prediction accuracy of 72%-83% and a positive predictive value of 41%-76% with an AUC of 0.81. External validation revealed an AUC of 0.68 and a Brier score of 0.321 ± 0.027.

Conclusion

Clinical variables can predict risk of death within 30 and 90 days for patients with MBC. Further validation and optimization studies are required to maximize clinical utility and acceptability before implementation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

How Long Should We Wait? The Impact of Immature Data on Colorectal Cancer Decision Modeling.

OBJECTIVE To identify a practical data maturity threshold at which model-based long-term survival projections become sufficiently reliable to inform health technology assessment (HTA). METHODS This retrospective modeling study used real-world, patient-level data from the Korea Clinical Data Utilization Network for Re...

J. Sim, Gyeongseon Shin, Donghwan Lee et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Rule-Based Identification of a Reliable Real-World Cancer Recurrence Endpoint.

This scalable method enables derivation of real-world endpoints from EHR-based data and may be used to characterize outcomes for patients treated outside of prospective clinical trials and may inform the creation of synthetic control cohorts to support regulatory approvals for new drugs in rare tumor or biomarker defin...

J. Lavery, Samantha Brown, Chelsea Nichols et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Are Limited Electronic Medical Record Follow-Up Data Sufficiently Useful for Validating the Performance of Survival Prediction Models?

PURPOSE Machine learning models that predict survival time for patients are increasingly used for clinical decision support. Validating model performance in deployment is important but challenging because the only timely source of follow-up/death data is the electronic medical record (EMR), which is known to undercaptu...

Vigneshwari Subramanian, Tyler Raclin, B. Narasimhan et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Construction and Validation of a Nomogram Model for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Colorectal Cancer Based on the SEER Database.

The nomogram model incorporating clinicopathological and demographic variables showed higher predictive accuracy than conventional TNM staging for CSS in CRC patients and indicated that the nomogram provided higher net benefit for prognostic risk classification than the traditional TNM staging system across a wide rang...

Yi Liu, Xiao-Jun Tang, Zhi Liu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.