GPU undervolting is a readily deployable hardware-level defense requiring no algorithmic change, and opens a promising direction in which robustness and energy efficiency move together.
Abstract
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) face a dual challenge: vulnerability to adversarial attacks and prohibitive training cost. Adversarial training is effective but expensive, a burden that grows as learning shifts to the energy-constrained edge. This paper addresses both through GPU undervolting during training. Reducing supply voltage introduces stochastic perturbations that act as implicit regularization, improving robustness while lowering power. We characterize undervolting-induced faults at the bit level, then train LeNet, VGG-6, and MobileNetV3 on MNIST and CIFAR-10 under two training regimes, standard and adversarial, each at nominal and undervolted voltage, and evaluate all models against adversarial attacks. In both regimes, the undervolted model consistently achieves higher adversarial accuracy than its nominal-voltage counterpart, showing that hardware-induced faults strengthen even adversarial training. Because dynamic power scales quadratically with supply voltage, these robustness gains arrive with substantial energy savings. GPU undervolting is therefore a readily deployable hardware-level defense requiring no algorithmic change, and opens a promising direction in which robustness and energy efficiency move together.
Results show that adversarial training improves robustness against input perturbations but increases sensitivity to stuck-at-zero weight faults, highlighting the need to jointly consider adversarial robustness and hardware reliability.
This paper evaluates the robustness of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier, a leading algorithm in state-of-the-art HT detection frameworks, under gradient-based adversarial attacks, and highlights the need to reframe hardware security evaluations beyond nominal accuracy toward adversarial robustness.
Ashutosh Ghimire, Lingwei Chen, Cole Castronova et al.· Journal of electronic testin...· 0 citations
The study concluded that adversarial resilience is largely determined by the interaction between model architecture and defense strategy, highlighting the need for architecture-specific defense selection when developing secure medical image classification systems.
Y. Heryadi, I. Sonata, Bambang Krismono Triwijoyo· Matrik· 0 citations
This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhance robustness against evolving adversarial threats.
Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar· Journal of Computer Virology...· 0 citations
This work comprehensively investigates computation-efficient strategies to speed up latent adversarial training from two complementary perspectives, and reduces per-step adversarial-training FLOPs by 48.1% while requiring only 0.0118% trainable parameters.
This survey examines a recent class of adversarial efficiency degradation attacks that target these mechanisms to increase computation without necessarily degrading accuracy, and unify and compare two representative attacks across three popular token-pruning frameworks.
Anadi Goyal, Nandish Chattopadhyay, Anupam Chattopadhyay et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.