Jul 2026· Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference· pp. 1-4· 0 citations· 23 references
Abstract
Large language models may suffer from insufficient context use and unsupported generation in question answering tasks that require external knowledge. This study compares the main strategies affecting retrieval and generation performance in retrieval-augmented generation systems within a common experimental setting. In addition to a standard dense retrieval baseline, we evaluate multi-query, hypothetical document, hypothetical question, sparse-dense hybrid retrieval, and chunk compression, and we also propose an integrated method (FUSERAG) that combines these components. Experiments are conducted on a dataset containing 223 documents, 7933 chunks, and 1488 question-answer instances. Results show that the proposed method achieves the highest Mean Reciprocal Rank, nDCG at 5, and recall at 5 at the retrieval level, while the sparse-dense hybrid approach yields the best generation results.
This work conducts an empirical study of how irrelevant retrieved passages affect downstream generation, and proposes a lightweight, context-size classification module that dynamically predicts how much context is required based on query-specific needs.
Maya Iratni, M. Boughanem, T. Dkaki· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
The Adaptive Multi-Stage Vector Retrieval (AMSVR) framework is proposed, prioritising weighted, drift-resistant composition over uniform fusion, and offers tailored configurations: AMSVR-Scientific (dense + tuned hybrid) peaks at NDCG@10 = 0.7570 on SciFact, while AMSVR-Full (seven stages) targets broader, noisier corpora where Recall@100 matters most.
Samsudeen Alabi Bankole, Yakub Kayode Saheed· NLP & Big Data· 0 citations
Experimental results show that SAC-RAG reduces token consumption by 38%–58% at the cost of only a 1–2 percentage point EM drop, with EM actually improving after compression for reasoning-type questions, achieving the optimal quality–efficiency trade-off in terms of token consumption.
Deyu Zhang, Hongqiang Yu, Jinze Huo et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
Evaluation on a multi-page technical PDF document shows that the hybrid retrieval and re-ranking stages together raise retrieval precision and reduce irrelevant or unsupported answers compared with retrieval limited to a single method, supporting the use of this approach for reliable, document-grounded question answering.
Vishwa K Dave, K. Pallavi· International Research Journ...· 0 citations
Real-world knowledge resides in multimodal documents, necessitating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for accurate question answering. However, existing multimodal RAG models are primarily designed for single-image or closed-document settings and exhibit limited accuracy in realistic multi-image scenarios. Moreover, processing numerous retrieved images incurs substantial computational overhead from irrelevant visual tokens. To address these challenges, we introduce DocLongRAG, a large-scale dataset of 343K question--answer pairs, each associated with an average of 37.4 retrieved images to reflect authentic RAG workflows. Building on this dataset, we propose Doc-REFRAG, a question-guided framework that compresses visual tokens into coarse chunks and selectively expands question-relevant ones via a lightweight RL-based selector. Experiments on six benchmarks show that Doc-REFRAG outperforms eleven strong baselines, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy with significantly lower inference latency. Our resources are available at https://github.com/Collab-Gen/Doc-REFRAG.
Ruofan Hu, Sheng Xu, Minjie Hong et al.· 0 citations
In this work, we propose GuidedRAG, a novel extension to traditional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that introduces a dedicated selection stage and semantic steering during retrieval. In contrast to current state-of-the-art RAG approaches, which depend on increasingly complex retrieval and knowledge structures, GuidedRAG constrains the knowledge base using semantics before retrieval, aligning the retrieval space with user intent while substantially reducing the search space. Our evaluation shows that GuidedRAG improves retrieval relevance by 14.0-15.8%, mitigates a 19.7-27.4% loss in retrieval precision, and reduces retrieval overhead by orders of magnitude. Moreover, relevant chunks are consistently retrieved earlier in the ranking process, while alignment with user intent improves by 31.8-36.8%. We further show that GuidedRAG achieves full coverage across 15 diverse RAG variants, demonstrating generalizability across the literature. Together, these findings establish semantic steering and selections as a powerful and generalizable paradigm for improving the current state-of-the-art in RAG.
Matthijs Jansen op de Haar, Tobias Stähle, Lorenzo Gatti· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
