Offshore wind resource assessment traditionally uses scaling formulas, such as power-law and logarithmic wind profiles with fixed surface roughness, to extrapolate near-surface wind measurements to turbine heights, overlooking the dynamic role of ocean waves. Here, the authors systematically examine how wave-informed scaling impacts offshore wind power and ambient turbulence estimates, considering a logarithmic wind profile with variable sea-surface roughness and a wave-spectrum-dependent drag coefficient formulation. Seasonal expected wind power density, turbulence energy density, and turbulence intensity are evaluated at a representative hub height of 110 m using high-resolution observations from a NOAA buoy in the Northwest Atlantic. The spectral-bandwidth-based formulation yields the highest estimates of power and turbulence across all seasons, outperforming the variable-roughness approach by approximately 20% in winter, 40% in summer, and up to 50% in transitional months, due to its sensitivity to mixed sea states. The power-law approach ranks second, yielding about 20% higher power than the constant-roughness method year-round. The wave-informed variable-roughness formulation offers intermediate estimates relative to the two wave-independent methods. Comparison with existing literature supports these results, showing that the spectral-bandwidth formulation exceeds the published annual mean power density by approximately 23%. Although these findings are not transferable to other oceanic regions and variations in air density and atmospheric stability have not been considered, this study clearly demonstrates the importance of incorporating wave characteristics into the analysis.
Offshore wind farms operate within the marine atmospheric boundary layer, where ocean waves can modify air-sea momentum transfer, turbine inflow, and wake recovery. Wave-resolved simulations can capture phase-dependent wind--wave interactions, but their computational cost and implementation complexity limit their use i...
Manuel Ayala, Zein Sadek, R. Cal et al.· 0 citations
This study investigates wind‐wave interactions on offshore wind energy production by comparing a coupled atmosphere‐wave model (WRF‐SWAN) with a stand‐alone atmospheric model (WRF). Using statistical metrics and LiDAR wind measurements from Porto‐Ilha, Brazil, we evaluate the model's ability to capture wind variabili...
Nícolas de Assis Bose, L. Farina, Vanessa de Almeida Dantas et al.· Journal of Geophysical Resea...· 0 citations
Ocean surface waves propagating into the marginal ice zone influence the extent and properties of sea ice through wave–ice interactions. However, the attenuation of wave energy by sea ice remains poorly represented in wave models used for climate projections and operational forecasting, and no universally applicabl...
Zhao-Hui Cheng, Ø. Breivik, J. Rabault et al.· Journal of Physical Oceanogr...· 0 citations
Breaking waves are the dominant pathway by which energy is dissipated at the ocean surface, yet their definition, dynamics, and energetics remain subjects of ongoing debate. Here, we present results from a six-week field campaign during the Coastal Land–Air–Sea Interaction project, where wave breaking was detected ac...
S. Knobler, J. Ruiz‐Plancarte, R. Yamaguchi et al.· Journal of Physical Oceanogr...· 0 citations
<p>Solar panels (SPs) are designed to withstand wind-induced loading, characterised by varying wind speeds and directions, as well as high turbulence. This paper examines force coefficient statistics—mean, standard deviation, 3-s gust and peak values—on an isolated SP model, using data from an experimental...
Kristina Kostadinović-Vranešević, U. Winkelmann, R. Höffer et al.· ASES CONGRESS 2026· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.