Comparison of MRI sequences for optic nerve lesion detection in the follow-up of multiple sclerosis
TL;DR
In patients with established MS, whole-brain sequences (fs-FLAIR, DIR) perform comparably to dedicated orbital sequences (STIR) in detecting optic nerve lesions, which supports the feasibility of MRI protocols by omitting additional orbital sequences in routine follow-up, thereby reducing scan time and patient burden without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.
Abstract
Background: Optic nerve involvement is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is now recognized as a key site for dissemination in space under the most recent revision of McDonald's criteria. Reliable detection of optic nerve lesions is essential for diagnosis and monitoring, yet the optimal MRI sequence remains uncertain. Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of three MRI sequences - short tau inversion recovery (STIR), fat-suppressed FLAIR (fs-FLAIR), and double inversion recovery (DIR)- in detecting optic nerve lesions in MS patients. Methods: Fifty-nine MS patients underwent MRI with STIR, fs-FLAIR, and DIR sequences and visual evoked potential (VEP) testing. Lesion detection was assessed independently for each sequence, and results were compared to structural and functional standards. Results: No significant differences were found in lesion detection across the three sequences. All sequences showed similar sensitivity to structural and functional changes. The incremental benefit of adding orbita specific sequence to a whole-brain sequence was limited in the follow-up of MS. Conclusion: In patients with established MS, whole-brain sequences (fs-FLAIR, DIR) perform comparably to dedicated orbital sequences (STIR) in detecting optic nerve lesions. This supports the feasibility of MRI protocols by omitting additional orbital sequences in routine follow-up, thereby reducing scan time and patient burden without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.