Sep 2026· International Review of Pragmatics· 0 citations· 5 references
Abstract
The Malay suffix ‑
an
plays a central role in the language’s system of derivational morphology, and we argue that its role extends far beyond simple nominalization. This paper examines the semantic range of ‑
an
and its metaphorical and relational networks based on previous linguistic research and semantic analysis. Although some words with and without ‑
an
may appear similar in meaning, their coexistence is not redundant. The addition of ‑
an
introduces specific semantic functions that create meaningful distinctions. The analysis identifies four major semantic extensions associated with ‑
an
:
product of action
,
measurement
,
locative
, and
plurality
. Each extension reflects metaphorical and conceptual expansion: in
product of action
, ‑
an
profiles the outcome or resultant entity of an action; in
measurement
, it may signal magnification; in
locative
, it shifts reference from an entity to a spatial domain; and in
plurality
, it contributes a collective or taxonomic interpretation rather than simple numerical plurality. The suffix interacts with discourse context and allows speakers to move between literal and abstract meanings while marking differences in quantity, scope, and spatial perspective. The study shows that ‑
an
exhibits semantic flexibility and structural complexity. It participates in a broader system of meaning construction in Malay. It also carries pragmatic force and guides interpretation in context, with effects on how speakers construe meaning in interaction. This reflects the language’s capacity to express subtle conceptual distinctions through morphology.
Translation between Arabic and English is often introduced through visible contrasts in script, sound, word order, and morphology. Those contrasts matter, but they do not fully explain why an apparently accurate translation may still alter agency, weaken a metaphor, change the degree of certainty, or flatten the rhythm...
Elsayed Mohammed Aly Misfir bin Mahmas Al-Dosari· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
This research examines the relationship between Ibn Jinni’s concept of major derivation (al-ishtiqāq al-kabīr) and the theory of semantic fields through an analysis of selected patterns of permutation within sound Arabic roots as attested in Qur’anic usage and Arabic lexicographical sources. The study proceeds from the...
Kholoud Ahmed Al-Shaibani Abu Ras· Shihab Journal of Humanities· 0 citations
This article looks at the possibility of using morphemes, in this case suffixes in relational adjectives, as
markers of conceptual relations. Noun phrases with relational adjectives involve a head noun, an adjective derived from a noun,
and a suffix. Following the hypothesis of constructional morphology, we can a...
A. Condamines· Terminology. International J...· 0 citations
This study rigorously examines the significance of personal deictics in Arabic from an integrated semantic–pragmatic perspective, using Ziyārat Wārith as an analytical case study. It proceeds from the central hypothesis that personal deictics—particularly pronouns and vocative forms—extend far beyond a merely neutral r...
Nada Sami Naser· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
The aim of this research is to develop a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the modal phenomenon by exploring the commonalities, interrelations, and distinctions among lexical, grammatical, and modal meanings. This study seeks to examine the origins and historical development of modal words in the language and...
K. Ashinova, B. T. Sydykova, G. Orynkhanova et al.· Bulletin of Toraighyrov Univ...· 0 citations
Dyachronical analysis of levels of word formation in the Old Armenian and Modern Armenian languages shows that certain old Armenian analytic constructions have been transformed into compound words. These, however, have preserved a meaningful plan in the Modern Armenian language, sometimes revealing differences in the s...