Skip to content
Log in
#explainable ai Dataset Open access

PREVENTING WAR/BURNOUT: THE IRONIC PERSPECTIVES OF TRUTH, REALITY, AND WORKABILITY

Gerhard Ris
Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

PREVENTING WAR/BURNOUT: THE IRONIC PERSPECTIVES OF TRUTH, REALITY, AND WORKABILITY Gerhard Ris, author, is a pensioner, former DA magistrate, and lawyer · Preface This article has a one-page introduction as an excerpt on the topic: Preventing war/burnout: the ironic perspectives of truth, reality, and workability. It provides a tour of the horizons of the entire model, explained to an interested high school-level student. And, to any President of any court of law asked to take a timely interim measure in due order. My advice is to scan the index after having read the introduction. After that, scan the 17-page AI chat at the end of this paper. I’d give the chat an 8/10 score: understanding what I’m on about after AI was very rejecting at first, yet asked pertinent questions. In the end, AI deems what I state as consistent with all scientific online data, something AI is indeed good at, even though it understandably/admittedly makes mistakes in understanding what I am saying. Then scan the entire article, highlighting new insights since my last 19 DOI-publications on Zenodo: the CERN repository. The article proves that mainstream science can’t validly falsify the simple one-A4-block model since 2014 because it’s correct, with enormous consequences across the board as the introduction shows. The block model is a proven law of everything since 2024. A law that always applies, showing childishly easy 3D Euclidean geometry. Beware of going down the rabbit hole by getting stuck in details and losing oversight. Lots of terms are jargon that I’ve corrected on this elementary topic. I’ve redefined ‘religion'. Many people have lots of religious anchors reading certain terms that produce allergic reactions. This stems from not being able to do what AI does correctly: being both extremely open-minded and extremely precise in checking all online data for consistency extremely fast. The pertinent orderly question is: why can’t mainstream science pose valid falsification within twenty-four hours? The answer is simple: fear of losing peer-review power because my method, which is a slight improvement on Richard Feynman’s, is undeniably correct. My model and method meet the highest possible scientific standard, which ironically is the same as that for good engineers and good lawyers, who both are used to working with proven best practices given the lack of data in accordance with the laws that govern the topics at hand. Enjoy this scary testable fairy tale! PREVENTING WAR/BURNOUT: THE IRONIC PERSPECTIVES OF TRUTH, REALITY, AND WORKABILITY To save any decent democratic legal system, distinguish between: good narcissistic team members, mentally healthy criminal narcissists, and pathological narcissists. Narcissism is a linear function of every human; when irreversibly transformed, it produces a narcissist. This can only be kept in desirable balance by following the new law of human nature as an exact science written in a book that everyone can easily follow, ironically living in nature without the need to read it, unless you start using written language, arithmetic, algebra, and geometry. For then we will start to build “this time unsinkable” Titanics, subsequently, as repeating history, hitting the same iceberg. When you, in essence, do the same, the same happens. As all mentally healthy high school students learn to go by this book after twelve to eighteen years of Bildung, we won’t sink into the abyss. Bildung is neurologically internalised healthy hypnotic illusionism, defined as deep religion. As long as one follows ‘The Law’, one is guaranteed to have an optimal life. The 64 DNA personality types of the modelled factory of everything, such as producing justified content lives for all, can and thus must be learned by everyone. Deep religion, religion, slight religion, and the non/not yet religious unique self in a unique situation is the proven best practice method to assess any situation. Otherwise, mounting egoism will invariably slowly lead to a narcissistic authoritarian society ending in the thermodynamics of conflict and war as the law of the narcissist. Around 40% of humanity, including most professors of physics and mathematics, lack the talent to spot any new form of even the simplest ironic twist in arithmetic, algebra, and geometry. This can be easily tested by the 60% with the ironic talent in language by recording it on video. Only performing the proposed Oracle Senate Test and transforming the dysfunctional Trias Politica into a new Cinque Politica can save any decent parliamentary-democratic legal system. More billionaires, no poor, no war is easy because there is no money gene in our DNA. Freedom of Thought, Freedom of Relations, Security, and Respect are most critical in the respective distribution: 10%-10%-40%-40% of the collective human brains organised and trained consistently with ‘The Law’. Suicide is an ironic survival trait of the species. Judges by democratic law must indeed follow mainstream science. The President of any court is solely responsible for the order of proceedings and may even be honour-bound to ask preliminary questions, especially when science admits to being in transition because of serious structural errors of the highest order. Sick science can only be cured by staying in balance with the 10% artistic & 10% spiritual minority who have that DNA talent that majority rule religion ironically prevents. For the first time in our history on an infinite timeline, all the elementary science is in. An easily falsifiable claim within 24 hours by any behavioural scientist. They should be able to show any inconsistency very precisely. The reductio ad absurdum proof presented on one A4 shows that all brain waves are identical to all the waves in everything as the order function of everything. The more absurd the world, the more difficult irony becomes. Elementary scientists should, like good engineers, learn to treat evidence and proof like good lawyers and magistrates should, with incomplete data yet complete laws of everything. Mother Nature is a mass murderer with mass and not matter as the elementary murder weapon. The publication containing the first thousand elementary terms, descriptions, and definitions for use in elementary science, schools, and courts of law proves this extreme limitation of the Babylonian confusion is possible, even though never perfect; still, it is critically important. Elementary paradox should solely mean an inward contradiction, and any deeper insights a seeming contradiction best termed irony. A paradox is not an enigma or a seeming contradiction. Truth and truths are defined from one perspective; reality and realities are defined from more perspectives; workability (werkelijkheid in Dutch) is defined from all perspectives, which is at the beginning of absolute proof of everything existing proven beyond reasonable doubt infinite on circumstantial evidence of only data pro non con with only one remaining axiomatic assumption that everything is consistent, meaning no contradictions or incompleteness in ‘The Law’ also as the law of human nature. QED!

DOI
View source

Similar papers

#explainable ai Sep 2026

End-to-End Federated Intelligence for Secure and Standardized Digital Twin Orchestration in 6G Smart Cities

Digital twins (DTs) are rapidly emerging as foundational enablers of 6G smart cities, offering real time monitoring, predictive analytics, and autonomous control across transportation, energy, healthcare, and industrial domains. Large scale DT adoption faces critical barriers including cybersecurity vulnerabilities, privacy risks, and the absence of standardized orchestration frameworks. This article presents Fed-DTOrch, a comprehensive end to end architecture that integrates federated intelligence, blockchain based audit trails, and AI governance to achieve secure and privacy preserving DT management. The proposed three tier architecture spans IoT and edge devices, domain specific twins, and a city level orchestrator, employing secure federated learning for model updates, lightweight cryptographic authentication, and tamper proof logging. We quantify the DT threat landscape, perform a standards gap analysis across ISO/IEC 27001, 3GPP TS 33.501, ITU-T IoT risk frameworks, and NIST AI RMF, and introduce a 6G ready security framework incorporating federated AI trust metrics, secure synchronization, and explainable AI audits. Cross domain evaluation across five smart city sectors demonstrates 35-60% privacy gain, 40-55% attack mitigation, 28-40% reliability uplift, 26-30% latency reduction, and >85% compliance readiness with <10% overhead. These results provide the first integrated blueprint that combines federated intelligence, blockchain-based auditability, and standards gap analysis to enable secure, standardized, and interoperable DT orchestration for trustworthy 6G ecosystems.

Li Wang, Xiuming Cheng · 1 citation
#generative ai Aug 2026

AI and Bullshit

It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.

Duncan Pritchard · 1 citation
#explainable ai Review Sep 2026

On the Interplay of Explainability and Fairness in AI: A Survey

Algorithmic fairness and explainability are foundational pillars of responsible AI. Although often studied independently, their interplay is increasingly recognized as crucial for diagnosing and mitigating bias in machine learning systems. We first introduce two systematic taxonomies: one for algorithmic fairness and one for explainable AI, to organize the landscape of existing work across diverse tasks (classification, ranking, and recommendation) and data modalities (tabular, graph). Next, we categorize the use of explanations in fairness efforts into three main functions: (a) detecting and understanding the causes of unfairness, (b) defining enhanced fairness metrics, and (c) designing mitigation strategies. In addition, we examine how explanation methods themselves can be biased, underscoring the need to evaluate fairness for explanations. Finally, we identify open research challenges and outline promising directions for future research at the intersection of fairness and explainability.

Christos Fragkathoulas, Vasiliki Papanikou, Danae Pla Karidi et al. · 0 citations
#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

Adaptive Repayment Optimisation for SME Lending: A Stochastic Programming Framework with Generative AI Explanation

The Adaptive Repayment Optimisation Engine is introduced, a novel framework that applies constrained stochastic optimisation to the design of loan repayment schedules for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and contributes to the operations research literature by bridging stochastic programming, explainable AI, and financial regulation in a novel application domain.

John Christiansen · 0 citations
#explainable ai Open access Aug 2026

The Awakener: A Unified Materialist Theory of Consciousness as a Dynamic Process

What is consciousness? Despite millennia of inquiry, humanity still lacks a consensus definition. This paper proposes a unified, strictly materialist theory: consciousness is not an entity but a process-specifically, the dynamic process that occurs when a specific structure, formed within complex, chaotic circuits, formats and processes input data and produces output. The structure is the carrier; the processing itself is consciousness. Building on this definition, the paper introduces a two-layer architecture that distinguishes basal consciousness (the autonomous survival functions shared by nearly all living organisms) from advanced consciousness (spanning the awareness of basic sensations, self-awareness, metacognition, and abstract reasoning). We argue that the two layers are related not as a hierarchy of subordination, but as a partnership of trust shaped by natural selection. The paper further proposes the mechanism of the self-reinforcing circuit: advanced consciousness is not complete at birth; it must be "awakened" through sustained external stimulation. Once awakened, it consolidates its own existence by continuously reinforcing the neural pathways dedicated to it, sculpting the unique "I" of each individual. This mechanism offers a parsimonious explanation of dissociative identity disorder, personality change after brain injury, and the diversity of human personality. The Awakener model traces the complete evolutionary path: from primitive sensory-interpretation tools, through the emergence of intelligence, the first awakening event, and chained cultural transmission, to the birth of language and writing. We apply this framework to explain why intelligent animals never developed civilization, to predict which species might awaken next, and to redefine the current state of artificial intelligence as a frozen brain-structurally capable of consciousness, but temporally static: a single frame. Within a single, self-consistent framework, the theory unifies the core problems of consciousness research: the definition and essence of consciousness, the hard problem, the two-layer distinction, the physical basis of the "I", personality diversity, the evolutionary origin of consciousness, the boundaries of animal consciousness, the origin of language, the conscious status of AI, free will and the Libet experiments, split-brain interpretation, dreams and sleepwalking, and the relation between the subconscious and System 1/System 2. No immaterial components are required: every step rests on existing experimental evidence or established neuroscientific findings.

Yijun Mo · 0 citations

Related blog posts