The article introduces the Human–AI Hybrid Verification Framework (HAVF), which conceptualises misinformation verification as a layered process integrating automated detection with structured human evaluation, and emphasises deliberate scrutiny, contextual assessment, and ethical responsibility as essential complements to AI-based detection systems.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of misinformation on social media has intensified scholarly efforts to develop artificial intelligence–based detection systems, increasingly framing verification as a computational task centred on algorithmic performance and model optimisation. While these technological advances significantly improve scalability and detection efficiency, they also risk marginalising human judgement, ethical accountability, and contextual interpretation in the verification process. This study critically examines the epistemic orientation of contemporary misinformation verification research and proposes a hybrid framework that rebalances technological automation with human-centred evaluation. Using a bibliometric analysis of 54 Scopus-indexed publications, this study maps the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of misinformation verification scholarship between 2022 and 2025. Network and overlay analyses reveal a strong concentration of research around algorithmic modelling, detection performance, and transformer-based architectures, alongside a relative absence of explicit normative verification frameworks within dominant research clusters. These findings indicate an emerging automation bias in the field, where artificial intelligence increasingly functions as the primary epistemic authority in assessing informational credibility. In response to this imbalance, the article introduces the Human–AI Hybrid Verification Framework (HAVF), which conceptualises misinformation verification as a layered process integrating automated detection with structured human evaluation. Drawing on the epistemic principle of tabayyun, the framework emphasises deliberate scrutiny, contextual assessment, and ethical responsibility as essential complements to AI-based detection systems. By situating verification at the intersection of artificial intelligence, information ethics, and digital governance, this study contributes a hybrid epistemic perspective for addressing misinformation in contemporary social media ecosystems.
The mapped literature suggests that future policies should promote transparent, auditable, and participatory AI governance, support multilingual and culturally inclusive datasets, and integrate content moderation into broader digital public health and anti-discrimination strategies.
David Ruiz-Muñoz, A. M. Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca J. Sánchez-Sánchez· Sexuality Research & Social...· 0 citations
Background: Generative Artificial Intelligence (AIGC) has emerged as a transformative force in social media ecosystems, reshaping content production, algorithmic distribution, and platform governance. From large language models to multimodal generation systems, AIGC technologies have rapidly penetrated diverse social m...
Jian-Qi Kong· Journal of Computer Science...· 0 citations
Progress now depends less on architectural novelty than on label construction, temporally honest evaluation and outcome measurement beyond the confusion matrix, and almost no study measures downstream effects on audiences or on fact-checking workflows.
Mary Oluwakemi Abioye· Asian journal of mathematics...· 0 citations
This study examines the ethical tensions that have emerged with the integration of generative artificial intelligence systems and automated content algorithms into journalistic practices, focusing on the structural gap between institutionally recognized normative principles and the realities of newsroom practice. Adopt...
Nedim Serhat Bilecen· İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Ar...· 0 citations
The present study examines the patterns of algorithmic amplification on social media space to deceive public
opinions and preferences, known as political astroturfing—a process practiced by political parties, non-state actors and
interest groups that fake grassroots support for and against a particular cause, in realit...
S. S.· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
How Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing the news in the world of digital journalism: efficiency of operations and scale on the one hand and issues of credibility and public trust on the other. This research assesses trust in Digital News under the influence of Human-Centric AI and considers perceptual mechanisms....
Agustinus Rustanta, Sari Ramadanty, Tukina et al.· International Conferences on...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.