Sep 2026· Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is argued that insurers which proactively integrate AI governance into core ERM processes, supported by cross-functional collaboration between risk, compliance, data protection, and technology teams, will be best positioned to realise AI’s benefits while maintaining consumer trust, regulatory compliance, and resilience.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping the UK insurance sector, offering significant opportunities for efficiency, innovation, and improved customer outcomes. At the same time, AI introduces complex and fast-moving risks relating to model opacity, bias, data protection, consumer fairness, operational resilience, and third party dependency. This paper argues that AI does not constitute a wholly new category of risk for insurers; rather, it acts as a powerful amplifier of existing enterprise risks, increasing their speed, scale, connectedness, and potential impact. Drawing on regulatory guidance, industry practice, and emerging AI risk frameworks, the paper examines divergent stakeholder perspectives on AI adoption, including those of insurers, regulators, and consumers. It highlights a growing consensus that organisations must act now to integrate AI risk considerations into established enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks, rather than relying on parallel or siloed AI governance structures. The paper proposes a principles-based practical approach for embedding AI risk within existing taxonomies, registers, and control environments, with particular emphasis on identifying where AI amplified prudential, conduct, data protection, resilience, reputational, and third party risks. Particular attention is given to the role of data protection impact assessments (DPIAs) as a critical governance mechanism for identifying and managing AI-amplified risks, aligned with UK regulatory expectations and international developments such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (RMF) and the forthcoming European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act). The paper concludes that insurers which proactively integrate AI governance into core ERM processes, supported by cross-functional collaboration between risk, compliance, data protection, and technology teams, will be best positioned to realise AI’s benefits while maintaining consumer trust, regulatory compliance, and resilience. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.
Artificial intelligence (AI), and generative AI in particular, is being adopted across the insurance industry at the same time that customers are migrating to digital channels and demanding greater personalization. The purpose of this review is to examine how AI is reshaping insurance, why it can benefit customers, and...
Goncha Muradli· Turkish Academic Research Re...· 0 citations
This paper proposes a practical, audit-ready approach to governing data risks in the AI era, and introduces the concept of critical data elements (CDEs): data elements whose inaccuracy, unavailability, or misuse can produce material regulatory, financial, or customer-facing impact.
Xin-Fa Tu· Journal of financial complia...· 0 citations
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being adopted across healthcare, finance, manufacturing, cybersecurity, education, and other sectors because of its ability to support prediction, automation, pattern recognition, and decision-making. However, the growing use of AI also introduces technical, security, econom...
Sujal Mutgekar, Sanika More Sanika, Vipul Zope et al.· International Research Journ...· 0 citations
Generative and agentic artificial intelligence challenge assumptions embedded in traditional model risk management (MRM), including stable system boundaries, direct observability, controllable change, and access to model-development evidence. Yet the enduring purposes of MRM—inventory, materiality assessment, independe...
Timothy Godlove, John Buchanan· Transactions on Engineering...· 0 citations
This paper explores how AI can be deployed as a pre-review and triage mechanism — supporting global consistency, scalability, and time-to-market — while preserving human judgment, accountability, and regulatory defensibility.
Johanna Anders· Journal of financial complia...· 0 citations
This article compares US, Canadian, and EU regulatory approaches and shows how divergence creates compliance, competitive, and cross-border risks, and proposes four controls: autonomy-proportional governance, security by design, agent stress testing, and fiduciary controls.
Vincent Grégoire· Journal of Portfolio Managem...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.