This work presents NeuralFlowNet, a data-free, physics-informed proof-of-concept framework designed to solve steady Navier-Stokes problems across low- to high-Reynolds-number conditions, and establishes NeuralFlowNet as a reliable framework for future testing of unsteady and more complex simulations.
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a compelling pathway toward trustworthy artificial-intelligence-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) by embedding governing equations directly into the learning process. Many existing AI flow models require large simulation or experimental datasets and often remain problem-specific, limiting their generalization and physical reliability. Data-free PINN frameworks offer an alternative by learning flow solutions from the Navier-Stokes equations and prescribed boundary conditions, potentially reducing dependence on expensive CFD datasets while retaining physical consistency. However, traditional PINN frameworks have struggled at high Reynolds numbers, limiting their application in CFD. In this work, we present NeuralFlowNet, a data-free, physics-informed proof-of-concept framework designed to solve steady Navier-Stokes problems across low- to high-Reynolds-number conditions. We describe the proposed methodological framework and demonstrate its applicability using benchmark problems with increasing physical and geometric complexity. The results demonstrate that NeuralFlowNet can accurately recover steady flow fields across a broad Reynolds-number range, including cases with strong pressure gradients, without training on external flow-field data and while maintaining good agreement with reference numerical solutions. These findings establish NeuralFlowNet as a reliable framework for future testing of unsteady and more complex simulations and could provide a basis for developing trustworthy and efficient AI solvers for high-Reynolds-number fluid dynamics.
Grid-based fluid dynamics solvers routinely struggle with exhaustive meshing demands and ill-posed inverse problems. A practical mesh-free alternative is given by Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) but, applying them to highly elastic Oldroyd-B fluids results in many training failures. The High Weissenberg Number...
A physics-informed neural network framework driven by both physical mechanisms and measurement data is developed to reconstruct the steady-state full-field distribution of granular flows in a pipe, establishing a robust methodological framework for flow-field reconstruction in complex granular flow systems.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed governing partial differential equations directly into the training loss, offering a promising alternative to costly CFD solvers for unsteady flows. Yet the growing list of techniques proposed to improve PINN training is typically validated one at a time, leaving open whet...
It is concluded that aligning data-driven methods with physical constraints—and the training objective with deployment—is the path toward reliable, generalizable, and computationally efficient turbulence models for engineering applications.
Jia-Hao Hu, Jun-Ya Yang· The Physics of Fluids· 0 citations
Variants of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often treat neural networks as the main solution representation, yet solutions are encoded implicitly in high-dimensional weights, making training behavior and outcomes difficult to predict or analyze across different partial differential equation (PDE) settings. I...
The proposed approach accurately reproduces key turbulence statistics, resolves three-dimensional vortex structures, and maintains divergence-free velocity fields across prediction horizons up to a lead time of 0.3 Eulerian integral timescale.
Nikita Tsoy, Changhoon Lee· The Physics of Fluids· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.