Skip to content
Conference

Look, Then Guide: Training-Free Decoupling of Visual Goal Recognition from Navigation in Aerial Vision-language Navigation

Aug 2026 · 2026 12th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA) · pp. 1427-1434 · 0 citations · 29 references

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) show strong visual understanding for aerial navigation, but their action generation remains unreliable. We study this gap in the context of orbit-search-based navigation, where an aerial agent circles a reference landmark while a VLM detects a language-described goal. We find that the VLM recognizes goals with stable accuracy across configurations, yet the subsequent approach phase—where the VLM must navigate toward the recognized goal—succeeds only 11.3% of the time. The failure is not a detection problem but a navigation problem: the visual approach prompt uses a format absent from the training data, and no amount of prompt engineering restores performance. We propose Geometric Waypoint Navigation, which eliminates VLM-based navigation after detection. The aerial agent moves toward the detected direction using the same deterministic waypoint-following controller already proven in the orbit phase, requiring no additional training or parameters. On the CityNav test unseen split, success rate increases from 35.5% to 49.0%, substantially surpassing all published baselines including GeoNav (25.9%), HTNav (21.7%), and FlightGPT (21.2%). Detection rates remain exactly constant at 31.0%, confirming that gains originate entirely from improved navigation rather than improved perception. Controlled experiments show that geometric waypoint following outperforms VLM Replay by 8.0 percentage points, and a fixed 30m approach distance outperforms VLM-estimated adaptive distances by 3.0 points. Our findings suggest a broader design principle: when a learned model serves as a detector in an embodied pipeline, separating perceptual decisions from motor execution can substantially improve reliability.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

C$^2$Nav: Compare Before You Commit for Zero-Shot Vision-and-Language Navigation

This work instantiates a complementary model-robot interface: the VLM compares controller-constructed alternatives, while geometry, thresholds, action magnitude, and execution remain on the physical side in C2Nav, a training-free framework with three coordinated faculties.

Run-Tian Zheng, Cong-Peng Zhang, Ying Liu · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

FINE: Future-Informed Navigation Encoding for Data-Efficient Vision-Language Navigation

FINE is introduced, a Future-Informed Navigation Encoding framework that extracts this latent supervision from existing demonstrations and improves success rate on R2R-CE and RxR-CE val-unseen, recovering roughly one-third of the performance lost by reducing the training demonstrations.

Khang Nguyen, Hoang Pham Quang Nguyen, Ha Phuong Nguyen et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

What do VLM-Based Vision-Language Navigation Models Rely on: Interpreting and Steering Policy Behavior

This work uses intervention-based metrics that measure how visual observations, instructions, and visual memory causally influence navigation decisions and shows that these navigation policies are sensitive to all input modalities and do not depend on a single one.

Débora Oliveira Makowski, Samiran Gode, Abhijeet Nayak et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

FILD-Nav:Vision-and-Language Navigation with Instruction Landmark Features in Continuous Environments

FILD-Nav extracts task-relevant landmarks from instructions and incorporates landmark semantics into both waypoint prediction and topological planning, which improves waypoint relevance and enables more effective long-horizon navigation.

Chuan-Ye Hu, Lu-Lu Liu, Huai-Wei Si et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.