Sep 2026· Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling· 0 citations· 61 references
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
TL;DR
This work introduces SB2025, a calculation-ready set of 1,244 protein-ligand complexes derived from the PDB, curated using literature-based ligand protonation states, and freely available in DOCK6, AutoDock Vina, and AutoDock 4 (AD4) formats.
Abstract
High-quality test sets to evaluate docking software help the community understand strengths and weaknesses of different methods and programs. In this work, we introduce SB2025, a calculation-ready set of 1,244 protein-ligand complexes derived from the PDB, curated using literature-based ligand protonation states, and freely available in DOCK6, AutoDock Vina, and AutoDock 4 (AD4) formats. SB2025 includes 322 unique proteins, 17 major protein classes, and ligands with a wide range of properties and flexibilities, making it a broad and challenging test set. FARMA2025, a specific subset of SB2025, contains 165 approved drugs bound to their pharmacological targets and closely mirrors the distribution of FDA drug target classes for small molecules through 2023 (r2 = 0.72). Comprehensive benchmarking was subsequently performed to evaluate pose reproduction (PR), cross-docking (CD), database enrichment (DE), and reverse docking (RD) under standardized conditions. Averaged PR success rate across triplicate runs for DOCK6 was slightly improved compared to Vina (followed by AD4) using both the large SB2025 test set and the more drug-focused FARMA2025 test set. Conversely, CD matrix success rates for AD4 were more favorable than DOCK6 or Vina across 11 protein families. The programs all yielded substantial early DE; however, the number of active ligands in common between the programs within the top 1% of the database, with one exception, was surprisingly low. Challenging RD tests using FARMA2025, which gauge the ability to correctly rank the cognate structure best, indicate that generating the correct ligand pose is necessary but not sufficient. SB2025, FARMA2025, and example scripts and protocols for benchmarking are available at ringo.ams.stonybrook.edu (downloads) and github.com/rizzolab.
Virtual screening remains a critical step in structure-based drug design, yet variability in docking algorithms and scoring functions often limits its reliability. To address this challenge, we introduce DockM8, an open-source platform for consensus virtual screening that integrates pocket detection, ligand preparation...
Antoine Lacour, Hamza Agha, Anna K. H. Hirsch et al.· Journal of Cheminformatics· 4 citations
Protein–ligand pose prediction is central to structure-based drug discovery, yet the relative performance of physics-based and AI-driven methods under realistic cross-docking conditions remains insufficiently characterized. Here, we compare physics-based docking methods (AutoDock4, AutoDock Vina, and DOCK 6) with data-...
Kapali Suri, Anshul Yadav, A. Tripathi et al.· RSC Advances· 0 citations
“NextTopDocker” is presented, a large, up-to-date, open-access data set for docking-power assessment comprising 14,038 training and 5201 test entries across 3173 unique protein targets, constructed from the Protein Data Bank.
Cao-Minh Truong, Pedro J. Ballester, O. Taboureau et al.· Journal of Medicinal Chemist...· 0 citations
Docking should be considered as an important and computationally inexpensive reference baseline for binding affinity prediction, and the scoring function and the protein structure are the most important factors for binding affinity accuracy in rigid docking with the MOE software.
Konstantinos Tornesakis, J. Essex, Paul A. Cox et al.· Journal of Computer-Aided Mo...· 0 citations
The network-pharmacology module of Drug Design Studio (DDS) 2.0 is presented, a unified, user-friendly platform that streamlines the entire workflow—disease target retrieval, compound–target prediction, shared-target identification, protein–protein interaction (PPI) network construction, hub-gene ranking and Gene Ontol...
Mahmoud E. S. Soliman· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) is a cornerstone of computer-aided drug design, yet its success depends on selecting a combination of docking tools, scoring function (SF), and ranking strategies. MolDockLab addresses this challenge with an automated, data-driven framework that optimizes SBVS workflows for a pr...
Hamza Agha, Y. Ibrahim, Michael Backenköhler et al.· npj Drug Discovery· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 6, 2026
Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.
Requirements in large systems rarely exist in isolation. Their meaning depends on the wider project context - other requirements, policies, decisions, tests, and implementation details. That becomes especially important when AI is used for review, because spotting a possible conflict or gap is only the beginning. ReqSpace explores how AI, visualisation, and connected project context can help reviewers understand those findings, trace the relationships behind them, and focus on the questions that…
AI is making software generation faster, but speed does not remove the need for expertise. As more work is delegated to AI, tacit knowledge may become one of the most important human advantages in software engineering. The post Beyond Prompt Engineering: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Software Engineering appeared first on GPT-Lab.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.